WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 425

Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act

119th Congress Introduced by Robert Aderholt and 178 co-sponsors

The bill would repeal or restrict federal provisions that authorize broad government surveillance to strengthen privacy protections and limit data collection.

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-701.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 425

Legislative bill overview

HR 425, titled the Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act, is a bill introduced in the United States Congress aimed at curbing government surveillance practices. The bill seeks to repeal or restrict certain federal provisions that authorize extensive surveillance and data collection on U.S. citizens. Its focus is primarily on restoring privacy rights and limiting the scope of government monitoring, which critics argue has become intrusive and overreaching.

Why is this important

The bill addresses growing public concern about mass surveillance and the erosion of civil liberties in the digital age. It aims to reinforce constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures by scaling back government authority to gather personal data without sufficient oversight or probable cause. This is significant given the increasing reliance on digital communications and the accompanying risks to individual privacy.

Potential points of contention

  • Security vs. privacy: Opponents may argue that reducing surveillance capabilities could hinder law enforcement and intelligence agencies' ability to prevent crimes and national security threats.
  • Scope and definitions: The bill's language may be contested over what constitutes and which specific surveillance measures should be repealed or restricted.
  • Implementation challenges: Transitioning away from established surveillance infrastructure could pose operational and legal difficulties.
  • Impact on intelligence sharing: Changes may affect cooperation between federal agencies and international partners.
  • Potential loopholes: Critics may worry about whether the bill sufficiently closes all avenues for unauthorized surveillance or if new methods could emerge.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.