Bill
HB 2480
HB 2480 prioritizes ecological water needs and watershed health in Arizona water policy, guiding DWR decisions and shaping permits, allocations, and ecosystem protection.
Note: the materials provided appear to combine text from two different bills that share the identifier “HB 2480.” One is an Arizona bill amending statutes in Title 45 (Waters) and the other is an Illinois amendment to the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act addressing peace‑officer residency in arbitration. Below are concise, separate summaries and the procedural status info included in the source.
Status: Referred to Rules Committee; introduced February 5, 2025 (Sponsors: Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton — primary; Cosponsors: Oscar De Los Santos, Nancy Gutierrez)
Purpose
- To add explicit statutory definitions and direct the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to consider and incorporate “watershed health” and ecological water needs into water management authorities.
Key provisions (from introduced text; truncated portions noted)
- Amends A.R.S. §45-101 (definitions) to add:
- “Ecological water needs” — defined as water sufficient to sustain freshwater ecosystems (including riparian areas), their wildlife habitat, and the human livelihoods/well‑being that depend on them.
- “Watershed health uses” — defined as water conserved in a natural watercourse that supports attributes of watershed health for an individual watershed as prescribed in a report required by §45‑105(B).
- Amends §45-105 (powers and duties of the Director of Water Resources) — adds or clarifies duties related to measuring, surveying, investigating water resources and managing watersheds; (full changes truncated in supplied text).
- Also lists amendments to §§45-151, 45-152.01 and 45-172 (text not included in full).
Who is affected
- Department of Water Resources and its regulatory/management activities.
- Water appropriators, water managers, and entities involved in surface water/groundwater allocation.
- Ecosystems (riparian areas), dependent wildlife and human communities — by elevating ecological/watershed health as considerations.
Potential impacts
- Introduces statutory footing for prioritizing ecological and watershed health in water policy and administration.
- May influence permitting, conservation programs, and allocation decisions; could require reporting/standards (per reference to a §45‑105(B) report).
- Exact operational impacts depend on further text in truncated sections (implementation, funding, rulemaking).
Source: Illinois bill text included (Rep. Stephanie A. Kifowit listed in the Illinois file)
Purpose
- To change how residency requirements for peace officers are treated in arbitration decisions under the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act.
Key provisions
- Amends 5 ILCS 315/14 to (as introduced):
- Expand the municipal population threshold used in the statute from “under 100,000” to “under 1,000,000” when specifying residency-related conditions for arbitration of peace officer disputes.
- Clarify that residency requirements for municipalities with a population under 1,000,000 are not a condition of employment that may be included in an arbitration award for a peace officer.
- Effective immediately.
Who is affected
- Municipalities and police departments in Illinois (those with populations under 1,000,000 become subject to the new limitation).
- Police unions, peace officers, and arbitration panels that resolve labor disputes.
- Local governments that might seek to adopt residency requirements as employment conditions.
Potential impacts
- Broadens the universe of municipalities for which arbitrators cannot include residency requirements in awards — likely limiting arbitrated imposition of residency rules in many additional cities and suburbs.
- May shift bargaining leverage toward officers/unions on residency matters; could lead municipalities to pursue residency policies through local ordinance/collective bargaining rather than arbitration.
- Immediate effective date would change arbitration practice as soon as enacted.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
