WeVote

Bill

Bill

HR 616

Yao, Mr. Francis Malan; condolences

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Segun Adeyina and 4 co-sponsors

Georgia House resolution honors Mr. Francis Malan Yao’s life and expresses condolences to his family.

House Read and Adopted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 616

Summary — H.R. 616 (as presented)

Note up front: the materials provided appear to combine two distinct items — (A) a state House resolution honoring Mr. Francis Malan Yao (text and GA-style legislative citation/LC number), and (B) a short federal-style amendment to the Internal Revenue Code raising a dollar limit in section 25C. The primary, coherent bill text and title supplied is a Georgia House resolution honoring Mr. Francis Malan Yao. The tax-code snippet appears to be an unrelated insertion. Below I summarize both pieces and flag the inconsistency.

A. Main item — Georgia House Resolution Honoring Mr. Francis Malan Yao

  • Title/purpose: A resolution of the Georgia House of Representatives honoring the life and memory of Mr. Francis Malan Yao and expressing condolences to his family.
  • Sponsor(s): Representatives Segun Adeyina (110th), Gabe Okoye (102nd), Arlene Beckles (96th), Sam Park (107th), Jasmine Clark (108th) — consistent with the LC 129 0358 Georgia format.
  • Key findings and content:
    • Mr. Yao was born April 8, 1945, in Assinie-Mafia, Côte d'Ivoire.
    • From 1977–2000 he served at the U.S. Embassy in Côte d'Ivoire with the Foreign Broadcasting Information Service (FBIS) as a Monitor Extraordinaire and Shift Supervisor, and was a founding member of the FBIS presence in Abidjan.
    • He oversaw personnel and assets and coordinated coverage of major regional events across Africa (wars, coups, natural disasters).
    • He moved to the United States in 2002, trained monitors for new FBIS bureaus, and settled in Atlanta in 2008 where he was active in the diaspora community.
    • He was married and is survived by eight children; the resolution praises his character, community service, and leadership.
  • Action requested: The resolution directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to provide an appropriate copy to Mr. Yao’s family.
  • Procedural status/timeline (as provided):
    • Filed/Introduced: January 22, 2025 (LC 129 0358)
    • Placed on Local & Consent Calendars and Congratulatory & Memorial Resolutions calendar in March 2025
    • Read and adopted by the House: March 18 and/or March 31, 2025 (records show multiple entries)
    • Reported enrolled: April 1, 2025
  • Effect/impact: This is a non-binding commemorative resolution. It has no legal or fiscal effect; its purpose is ceremonial — to formally honor Mr. Yao’s life and notify his family of the legislature’s expression of sympathy.

B. Separate inserted provision (appears unrelated)

  • Text provided (one paragraph) would amend section 25C(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by striking “$2,000” and inserting “$4,000”.
  • Effective date: Applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
  • Likely effect: If genuinely intended, that change would double the statutory dollar cap referenced in IRC §25C(b)(5) (the snippet does not include context about which credit/item the cap applies to). This would increase the maximum allowable amount under that specific subsection for taxpayers in applicable tax years.
  • Caveat: This tax-code amendment appears to be an editorial or clerical insertion into the memorial resolution packet; there is no coherent legislative context linking the tax change to the Georgia memorial resolution.

Bottom line

  • The primary, coherent document is a Georgia House commemorative resolution officially honoring Mr. Francis Malan Yao and expressing condolences to his family; it was adopted by the House and enrolled for delivery to the family.
  • The brief IRC amendment raising a $2,000 limit to $4,000 is a separate, stand‑alone tax provision with an effective date of taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2024. Its inclusion alongside the memorial resolution appears inconsistent and likely inadvertent. If you need, I can (a) prepare a focused summary only of the Georgia resolution, or (b) analyze the tax-code amendment in the context of federal tax law once you confirm that it is intended as a separate federal bill.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.