WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 5182

Worker's compensation: benefits; time period an injured worker may seek treatment from the injured worker's own physician or provider; modify, and provide additional requirements for the payment of medical benefits. Amends sec. 315 of 1969 PA 317 (MCL 418.315).

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joey Andrews and 27 co-sponsors

HB 5182 lets injured workers choose their treating provider, speeds access with 10-day employer responses, and imposes penalties for missed deadlines.

bill electronically reproduced 10/30/2025
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5182

Summary — HB 5182 (amendment to MCL 418.315)

Subject: Workers’ compensation — medical benefits, provider choice, and payment requirements

Purpose

HB 5182 amends section 315 of the Workers’ Disability Compensation Act (MCL 418.315) to modify employer obligations for furnishing medical care to injured employees, to clarify limits and licensing requirements for certain services, to strengthen an employee’s right to choose a treating provider, and to create timelines and penalties for employer/carrier responses to treatment requests and provider notices.

Key provisions

  • Employer duty to furnish medical care: Confirms employer obligation to furnish reasonable and timely medical, surgical, hospital services, medicines, and other treatment, plus dental services, crutches, artificial limbs/eyes/teeth, eyeglasses, hearing aids, and other appliances necessary to cure or ameliorate injury effects.

  • Limits on reimbursable services:

    • Optometric and chiropractic services are reimbursable only if they met specified definitions in the Public Health Code as of certain historical dates (optometry as of May 20, 1992; chiropractic as of Jan 1, 2009).
    • Services provided by professions that became licensed after Jan 1, 1998 are not required to be reimbursed if they were not licensed/registered by that earlier date.
    • Physical therapy is reimbursable only if provided by a licensed physical therapist or a PTA under a licensed PT’s supervision and pursuant to a prescription from specified licensed health professionals (cites parts of the Public Health Code).
  • Family attendant care cap: When attendant or nursing care is provided by a spouse, sibling, child, parent, or combinations of these relatives, the weekly ordered care cap is raised from 56 hours to 84 hours per week.

  • Employee choice of provider and timelines:

    • After notice/inception of medical care, an employee may treat with a physician or provider of their choice by providing the employer/carrier the provider’s name and a notice of intent. If the employer/carrier does not furnish reasonable and timely care within 10 days after the notice of injury, the employee may pursue care with their chosen provider and the employer/carrier must pay.
    • Treatment by the employee’s chosen provider is presumed reasonable.
  • Administrative timelines and penalties:

    • Employer/carrier must provide an “open claim” letter to the employee’s chosen provider within 7 days after receiving the employee’s notice. Failure to do so triggers a penalty of $100 per day payable to the employee, capped at $25,000.
    • Employer/carrier must give the injured employee, within 10 days of the employee’s notice of injury, a director-prescribed form informing the employee of the right to choose a provider and the employer’s obligations.
  • Preauthorization and dispute process:

    • Injured employees or their providers may request preauthorization for proposed treatment. The employer/carrier/TPA has 10 days to respond. If not authorized within 10 days, the employee may file for mediation or hearing; a magistrate may give such cases precedence.
    • Employers/carriers may file petitions objecting to the employee’s chosen provider; a worker’s compensation magistrate may hear the objection and order discontinuance of treatment or payment limits as appropriate.
  • Enforcement: The bill directs worker’s compensation magistrates to order payment of reasonable unpaid expenses or proposed care when employers/carriers/TPAs fail to meet obligations (text truncated in source; bill appears to strengthen remedies and ordering authority).

Who is affected

  • Injured employees: greater clarity and presumptions favoring their chosen treating providers, faster access to care, and monetary remedies when employers/carriers delay.
  • Employers, insurers/carriers, and third‑party administrators (TPAs): tightened response deadlines, documentation/notice obligations, potential monetary penalties and obligation to pay for chosen-provider care when statutory conditions are met.
  • Health care providers: must meet licensing/supervision requirements for reimbursement (esp. physical therapists/assistants); will receive faster “open claim” letters or gain enforcement leverage.
  • Worker’s compensation magistrates and the agency: increased caseload prioritization for medical disputes and clearer authority to order payments and adjudicate provider objections.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Bill introduced March 14, 2025; reported favorably (as substituted) out of committee May 7, 2025; committee and floor steps documented in May 2025. The version provided was electronically reproduced Oct 30, 2025 and referred to the Committee on Economic Competitiveness on Oct 30, 2025.
  • Specific statutory references amended: section 315 of 1969 PA 317 (MCL 418.315). Several timelines: employer response to initial care notice — 10 days; open claim letter — 7 days; preauthorization response — 10 days. Penalty: $100/day, capped at $25,000.

Note: The provided bill text was partially truncated in places; this summary reflects the available language and highlights where portions were incomplete.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.