WeVote

Bill

Bill

SF 2973

Wood upcycling campus appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Lindsey Port

Appropriates funds for a wood upcycling campus to convert wood waste into higher-value products, advancing sustainability and creating jobs in Minnesota.

Withdrawn and re-referred to Capital Investment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 2973

Summary of SF 2973 — Wood Upcycling Campus Appropriation

Overview

SF 2973 is an appropriations bill introduced in the Minnesota Legislature on March 24, 2025. The bill, titled “Wood upcycling campus appropriation,” is classified as an appropriations measure with a focus connected to Pollution and Pollution Control Agency policy. The bill has shifted between committee assignments and status: it was initially referred to the Environment, Climate, and Legacy committee, and on April 10, 2025 it was withdrawn and re-referred to the Capital Investment committee. A companion House bill is HF 3143.

Purpose and Intent

  • The title indicates the bill’s aim is to appropriate funding for a “wood upcycling campus” initiative. While the exact statutory language is not provided here, the intent typically would be to support facilities, programs, or partnerships that convert wood waste or underutilized wood resources into higher-value products or energy within a campus setting.
  • The environmental and economic rationale generally associated with such a measure would be to promote sustainable wood use, reduce waste, advance green manufacturing or research, and potentially stimulate related jobs and investment.

Scope and Key Provisions (Note on Text Availability)

  • The specific provisions, funding levels, eligible recipients, matching requirements, project scope, oversight, reporting, and sunset provisions are not included in the information provided.
  • In similar appropriation bills, key elements often include:
    • A designated funding amount or appropriations for a particular project or set of projects
    • Eligible applicants (e.g., state agencies, public universities or colleges, tribal or local partners, private-public partnerships)
    • Terms of use for the funds (capital investment vs. operating support)
    • Reporting and accountability requirements
    • Project timelines and milestones
    • Any matching funds or non-federal cost-sharing requirements

If you need precise provisions, the bill text as introduced and any subsequent amendments would provide the exact language.

Affected Parties and Sectors

  • State agencies with environmental or capital program responsibilities, particularly the Pollution and Pollution Control Agency (PCCA)
  • Minnesota higher education institutions and campuses involved in wood-related research, manufacturing, or sustainability programs
  • Wood industry stakeholders, including sawmills, wood product manufacturers, and recycling/upcycling firms
  • Local governments or public-private partnerships engaged in campus development or environmental projects
  • The broader environmental and climate policy community in Minnesota

Procedural Timeline and Status

  • March 24, 2025: Introduced and first reading; referred to Environment, Climate, and Legacy.
  • April 10, 2025: Withdrawn and re-referred to Capital Investment, indicating a shift toward capital investment considerations rather than primarily environmental policy within the committee process.
  • Related bill: HF 3143 (House companion).

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Environmental: Could advance sustainable wood utilization, reduce waste, and support pollution-control objectives through capital projects.
  • Economic/Job Growth: Potential to spur construction activity, new manufacturing or research capacity, and partnerships across public and private sectors.
  • Legislative Process: The move from Environment, Climate, and Legacy to Capital Investment suggests a change in the primary focus from ongoing environmental program funding to capital construction or infrastructure investment.
  • Oversight: Expectation of reporting requirements and performance metrics typical of capital appropriations to ensure project deliverables.

Next Steps / What to Watch

  • Review the full bill text and any amendments for exact funding amounts, eligible recipients, project scope, and reporting requirements.
  • Monitor committee actions in Capital Investment for hearings, potential fiscal notes, and any floor votes.
  • Track the House companion, HF 3143, for parallel progress and alignment with SF 2973.

If you’d like, I can summarize the companion HF 3143 once its text is available, or provide a side-by-side comparison once both versions are published.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.