WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 5653

Weapons: firearms; certain provisions regarding weapons; repeal. Amends secs. 230, 231 & 237a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.230 et seq.) & repeals (see bill).

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Greg Alexander and 28 co-sponsors

HB 5653 modifies Michigan's firearms regulations by amending criminal code sections governing weapon definitions and restrictions, affecting law enforcement enforcement and indi...

bill electronically reproduced 03/03/2026
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 5653

Legislative bill overview

HB 5653 proposes amendments to Michigan's 1931 Public Act 328, which governs firearms and weapons regulations. The bill modifies sections 230, 231, and 237a of the Michigan Criminal Code and repeals unspecified provisions. Based on the title and statutory references, this legislation addresses definitions, regulations, and restrictions related to firearms and certain weapons. The bill is currently in the House Judiciary Committee after initial introduction on March 3, 2026.

Why is this important

Firearms legislation in Michigan carries significant constitutional and public safety implications. Changes to MCL 750.230 et seq. could affect how the state defines prohibited weapons, regulates ownership, or establishes criminal penalties for weapons violations. Any amendment to these foundational statutes has broad application across law enforcement, prosecutions, and individual rights. The specific nature of proposed changes—whether expansive or restrictive—will determine the bill's impact on both gun rights and public safety frameworks.

Potential points of contention

Without access to the bill's full text, the primary contentious issues likely include:

  • Constitutional concerns: Changes to weapons regulations may face Second Amendment challenges depending on whether provisions expand or restrict firearm rights.

  • Scope of repeal: The bill's reference to unspecified repeals creates uncertainty about which existing protections or restrictions are being eliminated.

  • Law enforcement impact: Modifications to definitions in sections 230-231 could affect how police enforce weapons laws and what qualifies as a prohibited weapon.

  • Stakeholder disagreement: Gun rights advocates and public safety organizations typically oppose each other on weapons legislation, making consensus unlikely regardless of the bill's direction.

Obtaining the full bill text from the Michigan Legislature would clarify the specific amendments and repeals proposed.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.