Bill
HB 2513
Arizona HB 2513 expands liability by making it an offense to instigate others to commit weapon offenses, enabling charges against instigators.
Below is a concise, objective summary of the material you provided. The file contains multiple, conflicting texts and legislative histories associated with HB 2513 from different jurisdictions and on different subjects. I summarize each distinct version found and then note the inconsistencies and recommended next steps.
Summary — Key issue: Title vs. supplied texts
- Title provided: “Relating to contracts to administer a nationally normed assessment; declaring an emergency.” That title suggests an education/testing contract bill, but no text matching that subject was included.
- Instead, two different bill texts appear in the supplied content:
1. An Arizona House bill (HB 2513) amending Arizona Revised Statutes §13‑3102 (weapons).
2. An Illinois bill (HB 2513) establishing a Lyme Disease Innovation Program and authorizing a Lottery scratch‑off game to fund it.
Because the materials conflict, I summarize both identified versions below.
1) Arizona (weapons) — introduced version summary
- Purpose / intent: Amend Arizona’s “misconduct involving weapons” statute to expand criminal liability related to weapons offenses.
- Key change: Adds a new paragraph making it an offense to “instigate” another person to commit an offense listed in paragraph 1 (carrying a concealed deadly weapon in a vehicle under certain circumstances) or paragraph 8 (using or possessing a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony in chapter 34), where the instigated person commits that offense.
- Effected statute: Amends A.R.S. §13‑3102 (Misconduct involving weapons).
- Who is affected: Persons who solicit, incite, induce, or otherwise instigate others to commit the specified weapons offenses — they could now be charged under the misconduct‑involving‑weapons statute even if they did not personally carry or use the weapon.
- Impact: Broadens culpability to include instigators; would enable prosecutors to pursue charges against persons who encourage or arrange weaponized conduct carried out by others. Penalties would follow existing classifications in §13‑3102 and related sentencing statutes.
- Procedural notes: The supplied text is the “Introduced” version; status in the header reads “In committee upon adjournment.” No penalties or effective date are specified in the excerpt.
2) Illinois (Lyme Disease / Lottery) — introduced version summary
- Purpose / intent: Establish a statewide Lyme Disease Innovation Program (within the Department of Natural Resources/Conservation Code and interagency) and fund it through a new Lyme Disease Awareness Fund, including revenue from a special Illinois Lottery instant scratch‑off game.
- Key provisions:
- Directs the Department (various references) to create the Lyme Disease Innovation Program in consultation with Agriculture, Public Health, and University of Illinois INHS Medical Entomology Program within one year.
- Program duties: awareness, grants to state agencies and nonprofits, stakeholder engagement, passive tick surveillance, research and public education.
- Establishes the Lyme Disease Awareness Fund as a state special fund and authorizes the Lottery Department to offer a special “Lyme Disease Innovation” scratch‑off game with net revenue deposited to that fund.
- Grants rulemaking authority to the Lottery Department and authorizes use of Fund moneys for program operations and for the INHS entomology work.
- Who is affected: State agencies, non‑profits, public health stakeholders, University research programs, and the Illinois Lottery (administration and players). Ultimately intended to benefit people at risk of Lyme/tick‑borne diseases in Illinois.
- Impact: Creates a sustainable revenue stream (lottery proceeds) to support education, surveillance, outreach, and research on tick‑borne disease prevention.
- Procedural notes: The supplied Illinois text is an “Introduced” draft and includes many cross‑references to the Illinois Lottery Law and Administrative Code.
Legislative history / timeline — inconsistent record
- The legislative actions list you provided mixes many dates, actions, and outcomes (committee referrals, readings, floor votes, enrollments, governor signatures, an effective date of 9/1/25, and even a “pocket veto” entry). Those actions appear to come from multiple chambers and possibly different states. Because the underlying bill texts are from different jurisdictions (Arizona and Illinois), the supplied timeline cannot be reliably attributed to a single enactment without clarification.
Conclusions and recommendation
- The title you provided (nationally normed assessment / emergency) does not match any of the two substantive texts included. The file appears to combine at least three unrelated legislative items.
- Please confirm which HB 2513 you want summarized:
- The Arizona weapons statute amendment (instigation language), or
- The Illinois Lyme Disease / Lottery funding bill, or
- The education/testing bill referenced by the title (if you can supply that text).
- Once you confirm the jurisdiction/version (and provide the correct text if available), I will produce a focused, fully detailed summary including likely penalties, budgetary impacts (if text includes dollar amounts), and precise procedural status.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
