WeVote

Bill

Bill

SF 158

Virtual credit cards and network leasing-dental services.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Eric Barlow and 6 co-sponsors

Voters who register on election day or vote in person absentee must use a provisional ballot, counted only after eligibility is confirmed.

Assigned Chapter Number 117
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 158

Summary — SF 158 (Introduced Jan 29, 2025)

Overview / Purpose

SF 158, as reflected in the bill text provided, would change how persons who register to vote on election day or who cast an in‑person absentee ballot are permitted to vote at the polling place. Specifically, it requires such voters to submit a provisional ballot, and directs the absentee and special voters precinct board to count that provisional ballot only after determining the voter was eligible.

Note: there is a metadata discrepancy in the materials provided. The bill title shown (“Ellsworth Independent School District sales and use tax exemption for construction materials authorization”) and the bill subjects (taxation, school district) do not match the bill text, which addresses provisional ballots and election‑day registration. This summary focuses on the actual text supplied (provisional ballot requirement).

Key provisions

  • Requires any person who:
    • registers to vote on election day, or
    • casts an in‑person absentee ballot, to cast a provisional ballot rather than a regular ballot at the polling place.
  • Directs the absentee and special voters precinct board to count that provisional ballot only if the board determines the voter was eligible to vote.
  • Explicitly replaces current practice under which a same‑day registrant or in‑person absentee voter may cast a regular ballot if polling place staff can verify the voter’s eligibility using an electronic poll book.

Who would be affected

  • Voters who register on election day or who cast in‑person absentee ballots — they would no longer receive a regular ballot at the polling place but would be required to use a provisional ballot.
  • Local election officials and absentee/special voters precinct boards — increased responsibility to review provisional ballots and make eligibility determinations.
  • Counties and municipalities — potential administrative and resource impacts (handling, adjudication, and recordkeeping for more provisional ballots).

Procedural status / timeline (as provided)

  • Introduced: January 29, 2025
  • Referred: State Government (and listed also as referred to Taxes)
  • Subcommittee activity: 2025‑02‑04 (Subcommittee members: Rozenboom, Schultz, Winckler)
  • Sponsor: Senator Salmon
  • Related/companion bill: HF 870

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Likely increase in provisional ballots to be processed and adjudicated, raising administrative workload and possible processing costs for local election offices.
  • Potential for higher rates of ballot rejection if provisional ballots later are found to be invalid, with attendant concerns about disenfranchisement for same‑day registrants.
  • Changes the role of electronic poll books at the polling place: even when an eligibility verification is available electronically, voters would still be required to use provisional ballots under this text.
  • Implementation questions: required procedures and timelines for the precinct board’s eligibility determinations; notice and guidance to voters about the provisional process.

If you want, I can (1) reconcile the title/metadata conflict by checking legislative databases for SF 158 in the 2025 session, or (2) draft a short explainer for voters and local election officials describing operational changes and best practices.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.