WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 326

Veterans' home of Wyoming capital construction-2.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Eric Barlow and 5 co-sponsors

HB 326 directs DPI to study and report costed options to increase teacher planning time or reduce duties cutting it, due by Feb 15, 2026.

H Did not Consider for Introduction
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 326

Summary — HB 326: “DPI to Study Increased Teacher Planning”

  • Bill number: HB 326
  • Short title: DPI to Study Increased Teacher Planning
  • Primary sponsor: Rep. F. Jackson
  • Status (from provided materials): Passed first reading; referred to committees for review
  • Key dates: Effective upon statute — July 1, 2025 (if enacted). Report due to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee by February 15, 2026.
  • Appropriation: $5,000 nonrecurring from the General Fund for FY 2025–26

Purpose / Intent

Require the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (DPI) to study ways to increase teachers’ planning time (or to reduce duties that erode existing planning time), and to report actionable recommendations and estimated costs to the legislature.

Main provisions

  • Directs DPI to conduct a study of methods for:
    • increasing teacher planning time; and
    • decreasing teacher obligations that reduce current planning time.
  • Requires DPI to deliver a written report to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee by February 15, 2026. The report must include at minimum:
    1. Recommendations to increase planning time.
    2. Recommendations to reduce obligations that decrease planning time.
    3. Cost estimates associated with any recommendations.
    4. Any other relevant information DPI chooses to include.
  • Appropriates $5,000 (nonrecurring, General Fund) for FY 2025–26 to DPI to carry out the study; DPI may use funds to partner with a third party to complete the study.
  • Effective date specified as July 1, 2025.

Who is affected

  • Primary: public school teachers (planning time, workloads, daily schedules).
  • Secondary: local school districts and administrators (potential operational or staffing adjustments), DPI (administration of the study), and the legislature (will receive the report to inform policy and budget decisions).

Fiscal and procedural implications

  • Direct fiscal impact is minimal and one-time: $5,000 appropriation for the study.
  • DPI will incur administrative work to complete the study and prepare the report; it may subcontract the work.
  • Recommendations in the study could prompt future legislative or budgetary actions (e.g., changes to teacher schedules, reallocation/hiring of staff, collective bargaining or statutory changes), which could carry additional costs not covered by this bill.
  • The study report is intended to inform subsequent policymaking; any implementation of recommendations would require separate administrative or legislative steps and (likely) additional funding.

Bottom line

HB 326 is a focused study mandate: a small, time-limited appropriation directs DPI to analyze how to increase teacher planning time (or reduce obligations that cut into it) and to provide costed recommendations to the legislature by Feb 15, 2026. The bill itself does not change teacher schedules or obligations — it creates an evidence-and-cost basis for possible future reforms.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.