Utility Forced Relocation Expenses.
The bill requires the State or applicable city to reimburse utility relocation costs when relocations are caused by federally funded projects or city rights‑of‑way actions, shiftin
The bill requires the State or applicable city to reimburse utility relocation costs when relocations are caused by federally funded projects or city rights‑of‑way actions, shiftin
Status note: This summary covers the North Carolina bill titled "Utility Forced Relocation Expenses" (House Bill 849, 2025). The bill as filed would take effect when it becomes law. It was referred to relevant committees (Energy & Public Utilities; State & Local Government) and progresses through usual legislative steps.
Require the public entity that mandates relocation of utility or communications facilities (the State, a city, or certain public authorities) to bear the direct costs of relocation in specified circumstances — particularly where relocations are necessitated by federally funded highway projects or when a city directs relocations in its rights‑of‑way.
Section 1 — Amendment to G.S. 136-18(10):
Section 2 — New G.S. 136‑19.5(c1):
Section 3 — New G.S. 160A‑296.2 (city rights‑of‑way):
Sections 4–6 — Amendments to authority statutes (G.S. 160A‑479.15; 160A‑621; 160A‑651):
Section 7 — Effective date:
If you want, I can draft a one‑page explainer for municipal finance officers or a checklist for utilities on claims and documentation needed to obtain reimbursements under the bill.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.