WeVote

Bill

Bill

HJM 13

Urging the President and Congress to deploy National Guard troops overseas only if the deployment is expressly authorized by the United States Constitution.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by April Dobson and 3 co-sponsors

Urges President and Congress to require constitutional authorization for overseas National Guard deployments; a nonbinding memorial signaling state stance without creating duties.

In committee upon adjournment.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJM 13

HJM 13 — Urging constitutional authorization for overseas National Guard deployments

Overview
HJM 13 is a state House Joint Memorial that urges the President and Congress to deploy National Guard troops overseas only when such deployment is expressly authorized by the United States Constitution. As a memorial, the measure is non-binding and expresses the sentiments of the sponsoring body rather than creating new legal obligations.

Purpose and Intent
- To reaffirm the principle that overseas deployment of National Guard forces should occur only under explicit constitutional authorization.
- To align federal decisions on National Guard deployments with constitutional war powers and the appropriate checks and balances between federal and state authorities.
- To signal the legislature’s position on executive-federal use of National Guard forces in international deployments.

Key Provisions (as typical for memorials)
- A formal urging to the President and Congress to restrict overseas National Guard deployments to instances explicitly authorized by the U.S. Constitution.
- A restatement of the dual state-federal nature of the National Guard and the constitutional framework governing war powers.
- A non-binding expression of legislative intent; no new duties, penalties, or funding changes are created by a memorial.

Who Would Be Affected
- Federal authorities (President and Congress) would receive the legislative expression of the state’s position.
- State National Guard governance remains governed by existing federal and state law; the memorial does not change any statutory requirements or create enforceable obligations.
- State residents may see the memorial as a formal statement of the legislature’s stance on national security and constitutional powers.

Procedural/Timeline Aspects
- Introduced: February 27, 2025.
- First Reading: February 27, 2025 (referred to the Speaker’s desk).
- Referred to Committee: March 5, 2025 (Rules).
- Public Hearing: April 9, 2025.
- Legislative Action: In committee upon adjournment as of June 28, 2025.
- Sponsor: Alek Skarlatos (primary).

Sponsors
- Primary sponsor: Alek Skarlatos. Additional co-sponsors, if any, are not listed in the provided information.

Notes on Legislative Status
- The bill remains a memorial and is non-binding. Its value lies in formalizing legislative sentiment and encouraging federal authorities to adhere to constitutional constraints when authorizing overseas National Guard deployments.

Fiscal Impact
- Not indicated; memorials generally involve no direct fiscal obligations or changes to funding.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.