WeVote

Bill

Bill

HCR 160

URGING THE PEACE CORPS TO IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISH A MISSION IN THE MARSHALL ISLANDS.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by David Alcos and 3 co-sponsors

Hawaii legislature urges U.S. Peace Corps to establish a mission in the Marshall Islands to support regional development and strengthen Pacific partnerships.

Referred to ECD, referral sheet 22
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HCR 160

Legislative bill overview

HCR 160 is a Hawaii House Concurrent Resolution urging the federal Peace Corps to establish an operational mission in the Marshall Islands. Concurrent resolutions express the opinion of the legislature but are non-binding and do not create law. The bill essentially requests that the Peace Corps prioritize opening a formal office and deploying volunteers to the Marshall Islands.

Why is this important

The Marshall Islands, a freely associated state with the U.S., has historical ties to Hawaii through cultural, geographic, and migration patterns. Establishing a Peace Corps mission could provide educational, infrastructure, and capacity-building support to Marshallese communities. For Hawaii, it may strengthen regional partnerships and create volunteer opportunities for residents interested in Pacific Island development work.

Potential points of contention

  • Cost and prioritization: The Peace Corps operates with limited federal funding; opening a new mission requires resources that might be redirected from existing programs, raising questions about whether the Marshall Islands is a priority compared to other regions
  • Relationship with freely associated state status: The Marshall Islands' compact relationship with the U.S. is complex; some may question whether Peace Corps involvement could be perceived as colonial intervention or whether the Marshallese government has formally requested this
  • Effectiveness and local needs: Without documented local demand or assessment of what specific development gaps Peace Corps volunteers would address, the resolution may be symbolic rather than addressing genuine community priorities

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.