WeVote

Bill

Bill

HR 96

URGING THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU TO WORK WITH COMMUNITY GROUPS TO ADVANCE THE SYSTEM OF COASTAL TRAILS ON THE NORTH SHORE OF OAHU.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Terez Amato and 15 co-sponsors

Hawaii urges federal and local transportation departments to work with communities developing coastal trail systems on Oahu's North Shore to improve public recreation and non-motorized transportation access.

Reported from WAL (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1847-26), recommending adoption.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 96

Legislative bill overview

HR 96 is a non-binding resolution urging the U.S. Department of Transportation and Honolulu's Department of Transportation Services to collaborate with community groups on developing a system of coastal trails along Oahu's North Shore. The resolution has been adopted by the Hawaii House of Representatives and calls for coordinated planning between state, local, and community stakeholders.

Why is this important

Coastal trail systems can address multiple policy goals simultaneously: improving public recreation access, promoting non-motorized transportation, supporting tourism infrastructure, and enhancing community connectivity. The North Shore is a high-traffic recreational area where improved trail infrastructure could reduce vehicle dependence while preserving natural coastal environments.

Potential points of contention

  • Land acquisition and property rights: Developing coastal trails requires securing access rights across private properties, which may face resistance from landowners and create compensation disputes
  • Environmental and cultural considerations: North Shore coastal areas may contain sensitive ecosystems and Hawaiian cultural sites requiring environmental review and cultural consultation beyond community groups
  • Funding and maintenance responsibility: The resolution urges coordination but doesn't specify funding sources or long-term maintenance obligations, potentially creating unfunded mandates for local government
  • Competing coastal uses: Balancing trail development with existing recreational uses (surfing, fishing) and commercial interests could create implementation conflicts

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.