WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HCR 133

URGING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT TO STRENGTHEN LAW ENFORCEMENT CAPACITY TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND THE COMMERCIAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN BY STRENGTHENING STATEWIDE ENFORCEMENT INITIATIVES AND GENERATING A PLAN TO EXPAND SPECIALIZED INVESTIGATIVE PERSONNEL.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by David Alcos

Hawaii resolution urges Attorney General and law enforcement to develop expanded specialized units and statewide plans to combat human trafficking and child sexual exploitation.

The committee on HSH recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 8 Ayes: Representative(s) Marten, Olds, Amato, Keohokapu-Lee Loy, Takayama, Takenouchi, Alcos, Garcia; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Hartsfield.
#attorneygeneral #dle #sextraffickingprevention
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HCR 133

Legislative bill overview

HCR 133 is a resolution urging Hawaii's Attorney General and Department of Law Enforcement to develop enhanced capacity and strategies specifically targeting human trafficking and child sexual exploitation. The bill calls for strengthening statewide enforcement initiatives and creating a plan to expand specialized investigative personnel dedicated to these crimes.

Why is this important

Human trafficking and child sexual exploitation are serious federal and state crimes with significant victim trauma. Dedicated investigative resources can improve case detection, prosecution rates, and victim protection, while also serving as a deterrent. Hawaii's geographic isolation and tourism industry create unique enforcement challenges for these crimes.

Potential points of contention

  • Resource allocation: The resolution doesn't specify funding mechanisms, raising questions about whether existing budgets will be redirected or new appropriations are needed
  • Scope definition: "Statewide enforcement initiatives" is vague and could lead to different interpretations of implementation priorities and geographic focus
  • Performance metrics: The bill contains no accountability measures, timelines, or specific metrics to evaluate whether the urged actions are actually completed or effective

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.