WeVote
Log In

Bill

CT

Bill

SCR 11

SCR 11 - This concurrent resolution urges the Missouri Congressional delegation to uphold the principles of federalism with regard to the ability of states to govern their election processes and enact policies regarding campaign finance and election influence. JIM ERTLE

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Curtis Trent

Missouri urges its Congressional delegation to oppose federal election and campaign finance laws, asserting states should retain primary regulatory authority over these matters.

Voted Do Pass S Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions and Ethics Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SCR 11

Legislative bill overview

SCR 11 is a concurrent resolution urging Missouri's U.S. Congressional delegation to oppose federal legislation that would override state authority over elections and campaign finance. The resolution asserts that these matters should remain primarily under state control rather than federal jurisdiction, based on federalism principles.

Why is this important

Elections and campaign finance policy directly affect how voting occurs and how political campaigns operate. This resolution signals Missouri's position in the ongoing constitutional debate about whether the federal government or individual states should set these rules—a dispute that affects everything from voter registration procedures to campaign spending limits.

Potential points of contention

  • Constitutional interpretation: Opponents argue the Constitution grants Congress explicit power to regulate federal elections under the Elections Clause, while supporters contend the 10th Amendment reserves most election authority to states
  • Consistency with partisan interests: Critics may view this as selective federalism advocacy, since states often support federal action when it aligns with their political interests
  • Practical election administration: Concerns exist that extreme state variation in election rules could create confusion for voters and candidates in national elections, or enable discriminatory practices
  • Campaign finance implications: The resolution could affect debate over whether states can impose campaign spending limits or disclosure requirements that differ from federal standards

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.