WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2548

Upholstered household furniture manufacturing job tax credit; extend repealer.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Josh Harkins

Appropriates $959,870,100 to Illinois State Police for FY 2025 to fund operations, vehicles, forensic labs, IT, and grants.

Died In Committee
#finance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2548

Bill summary — SB 2548 (104th General Assembly, 2025–2026)

Title (provided): Upholstered household furniture manufacturing job tax credit; extend repealer.
Actual bill content (version provided): Appropriations for the Illinois State Police for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025.
Sponsor: Sen. Elgie R. Sims, Jr.
Status: Died in Committee (per record)
Introduced: 2/25/2025 (filed 3/13/2025 in some records)

Note: the bill title supplied to the request does not match the textual content provided. The text of SB 2548, as introduced, is an appropriations act for the Illinois State Police rather than legislation about a tax credit.

Purpose / Intent

To appropriate specified sums from multiple state and federal funds to the Illinois State Police (ISP) for ordinary and contingent expenses, program implementation and administration, equipment and vehicle purchases, forensic services, technology modernization, grants, and federally funded projects for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025.

Key provisions and dollar amounts (selected)

  • Overall synopsis totals (as introduced):

    • General Funds: $452,520,100
    • Other State Funds: $467,350,000
    • Federal Funds: $40,000,000
    • Total: $959,870,100

  • Division of Operations (General Revenue Fund): total ~ $448,970,700, including:

    • Personal services: $349,810,500
    • State contributions to Social Security: $11,608,700
    • Electronic data processing: $24,712,200
    • Operation of auto equipment: $19,558,500
    • Data system modernization and IT replacement: $5,000,000

  • Vehicle purchases: $30,000,000 (State Police Vehicle Fund)

  • Forensic Services & Identification:

    • Combined DNA Index System and statewide sexual assault evidence program: ~$2,197,400 (General Revenue)
    • State Crime Laboratory Fund: $15,000,000 for lab administration/operation

  • Program- and fund-specific appropriations (selected):

    • Fingerprint Program (State Police Services Fund): $28,000,000
    • Cannabis Regulation Fund (adult-use program costs): $5,000,000
    • Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Fund: $2,200,000
    • LEADS Maintenance Fund: $1,000,000
    • Drug Asset Forfeiture Fund: $4,000,000 (drug/cannabis/controlled substances enforcement)
    • Federal Asset Forfeiture Fund (Equitable Sharing): $2,500,000
    • Money Laundering Asset Recovery Fund: $2,000,000
    • Whistleblower Reward and Protection Fund: $18,000,000 (law enforcement purposes)
    • State Police Law Enforcement Administration Fund (cadet program): $25,550,000
    • Illinois State Police Federal Projects Fund: $40,000,000 (federal awards/grants, incl. prior years)

  • Grants: $500,000 from Drug Traffic Prevention Fund for Metropolitan Enforcement Groups.

Who would be affected

  • Primary: Illinois State Police (all divisions named — Operations, Forensic Services & Identification, etc.).
  • Secondary: law enforcement programs and local entities receiving grants or services (e.g., fingerprint services, metropolitan enforcement groups), forensic labs, cannabis program administration, and vendors/suppliers for vehicles, IT and lab equipment.

Procedural history & timeline (selected)

  • Filed/First reading: 2/25/2025 (introduced by Sen. Elgie R. Sims, Jr.).
  • Read first time / referred to committees: recorded 3/13/2025 and 4/03/2025 (referred to Health & Human Services in one entry; also references to Finance and Assignments appear).
  • Final recorded status in provided data: Died In Committee.

Notes / Caveats

  • The version text included is a detailed appropriations act for ISP; it does not address an upholstered furniture tax credit despite the initial title provided.
  • Some entries in the legislative actions appear inconsistent (dates and committee referrals). The status “Died In Committee” should be treated as the recorded final status in the supplied data.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.