WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 4214

Transportation: school vehicles; procedures when approaching a school bus displaying yellow flashing lights; modify. Amends secs. 601b & 682 of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.601b & 257.682).

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Brad Paquette

Requires drivers to slow and stop for a school bus with two alternately flashing yellow lights, stopping at least 20 feet away and not moving until the bus resumes.

defeated Roll Call #167 Yeas 52 Nays 51 Excused 0 Not Voting 7
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4214

Summary — HB 4214 (Michigan) — School bus yellow flashing lights; driver procedures

Purpose
HB 4214 would have amended the Michigan Vehicle Code (MCL 257.601b and 257.682) to clarify and add specific duties for drivers who approach a school bus displaying alternately flashing yellow (amber) lights. The intent was to increase safety for students by requiring drivers to slow and prepare to stop when a bus is about to stop.

Key provisions

  • Adds a new duty for drivers encountering a school bus displaying two alternately flashing yellow lights while the bus is stopped or stopping:
    • Immediately reduce speed and prepare to stop.
    • Bring the vehicle to a full stop at least 20 feet from the bus, and do not proceed until the bus resumes motion or the flashing lights are turned off.
  • Retains existing law for flashing red lights: drivers must stop not less than 20 feet away and not proceed until the bus moves or red lights are off.
  • Clarifies scope: the yellow- and red-light duties apply to vehicles traveling in either direction on the roadway, unless there is a median or other physical road division (with no crosswalk/pedestrian crossway) that separates the directions.
  • Defines “school bus zone” as the area within 20 feet of a stopped or stopping bus displaying two alternately flashing red or yellow lights (subject to the exceptions in section 682(2)).
  • Existing camera-based enforcement and civil-infraction framework for failing to stop for school buses (stop-arm camera evidence, citation procedures, and civil fines) remain in place; some committee substitute language (H-3) adjusted fine ranges between red-light and yellow-light violations.

Who is affected

  • Motor vehicle drivers statewide (all passenger vehicles, commercial vehicles) — especially drivers on routes where school buses stop.
  • School districts and law enforcement agencies using stop‑arm camera systems (evidence and citation procedures remain relevant).
  • Courts and local governments to the extent enforcement and citation volumes change.

Enforcement, penalties & fiscal impact

  • Failure to stop for a bus displaying red lights remains a civil infraction with specified fines (existing law: typically $100–$500; committee substitutes proposed differing ranges for yellow vs. red in some versions).
  • Fiscal impact: indeterminate. Additional civil infractions could increase revenue to support public/county law libraries and the Justice System Fund via $40 justice system assessments; local court workload impacts would vary.

Legislative history and status

  • Introduced by Rep. Brad Paquette, referred to Transportation & Infrastructure (introduced March 2025).
  • Committee substitute reported favorably (H-1); later substitute (H-3) considered.
  • On 2025‑06‑26 the bill (with substitute H-3) was defeated on the floor — Roll Call #167: Yeas 52, Nays 51, Excused 0, Not Voting 7.
  • Supporters who testified or registered in favor included the Berrien County Sheriff’s Department, Michigan Association of Pupil Transportation, and Bus Patrol America.

Note: This summary describes the Michigan HB 4214 package concerning school-bus yellow-light procedures and related Vehicle Code amendments as considered in 2025.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.