WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 379

TO REPEAL THE LAW REQUIRING THE TAX ADVISORY COUNCIL TO SUBMIT A REPORT.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Fran Cavenaugh and 1 co-sponsor

SB 379 aimed to enhance state-tribal consultation, ensuring tribal interests are considered in state decisions, but it ultimately did not advance in the legislative process.

Notification that SB379 is now Act 464
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 379

Summary of SB 379: Revise Laws Related to State-Tribal Consultation

Bill Information:
- Bill Number: SB 379
- Title: Revise laws related to state-tribal consultation
- Status: Died in Process
- Introduced: January 21, 2025
- Classification: Bill
- Subject: Indians, Revenue, State, State Government
- Primary Sponsor: Susan Webber

Purpose and Intent

SB 379 aimed to revise existing laws governing state-tribal consultation processes. The intent was to enhance collaboration and communication between state government entities and tribal governments, ensuring that tribal interests are adequately considered in state decision-making processes.

Key Provisions

While the specific text of the bill is not provided, the following general provisions can be inferred based on the bill's title and subject matter:
- Improved Consultation Framework: The bill likely proposed a more structured approach for state agencies to engage with tribal governments, potentially including timelines and protocols for consultation.
- Revenue Considerations: It may have addressed how state revenue policies impact tribal communities, ensuring that tribal perspectives are included in fiscal discussions.
- Legal and Administrative Changes: The bill could have included amendments to existing laws to streamline the consultation process and clarify the roles of state and tribal officials.

Impact

  • Tribal Governments: The primary beneficiaries of this bill would have been tribal governments, which would gain a more formalized platform for voicing their concerns and interests in state matters.
  • State Agencies: State agencies would be required to adapt their consultation practices, potentially leading to increased administrative responsibilities and changes in policy implementation.
  • Public Interest: The bill aimed to foster better relationships between state and tribal entities, which could lead to improved outcomes for both communities.

Legislative Timeline

  • January 21, 2025: Bill introduced and referred to the State Administration Committee.
  • February 27, 2025: Hearing held in the State Administration Committee.
  • March 5, 2025: Passed out of the State Administration Committee and scheduled for further readings.
  • April 1, 2025: Passed as amended in the Senate Finance and Claims Committee.
  • April 22, 2025: Concurred as amended in the House State Administration Committee.
  • May 23, 2025: Bill died in process, indicating it did not advance to a final vote or enactment.

Conclusion

SB 379 represented an effort to strengthen the relationship between state and tribal governments through improved consultation practices. Despite its potential benefits, the bill ultimately did not progress through the legislative process and was marked as "died in process" on May 23, 2025.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.