WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 387

TO REPEAL THE LAW REQUIRING OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING ENTITIES TO SUBMIT A REPORT CONCERNING THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS GRANTED AUTOMATIC OCCUPATIONAL LICENSURE AND EXPEDITED OCCUPATIONAL LICENSURE.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Fran Cavenaugh and 1 co-sponsor

SB 387 aimed to clarify electric bicycle laws, promoting their use while ensuring safety and compliance, but it ultimately did not pass and became inactive.

Notification that SB387 is now Act 470
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 387

Summary of SB 387 - Generally Revise Electric Bicycle Laws

Bill Number: SB 387
Status: Died in Process
Introduced: November 22, 2024
Classification: Bill
Subject: Transportation (also related to Motor Vehicles; Taxation--Transportation)

Purpose and Intent

The primary aim of SB 387 was to revise existing laws governing electric bicycles. The bill sought to clarify regulations surrounding the use, classification, and operation of electric bicycles within the state. This legislative effort was intended to promote the use of electric bicycles as a sustainable transportation option while ensuring safety and compliance with traffic laws.

Key Provisions

While the specific text of the bill is not provided, typical provisions in similar legislation may include:

  • Classification of Electric Bicycles: Establishing clear definitions for different classes of electric bicycles, such as Class 1 (pedal-assist), Class 2 (throttle-assisted), and Class 3 (speed-pedelec).

  • Usage Regulations: Outlining where electric bicycles can be operated, including restrictions on certain roadways or paths, and requirements for helmet use, especially for younger riders.

  • Registration and Licensing: Potential requirements for registration or licensing of electric bicycles, particularly for higher-powered models.

  • Safety Standards: Implementing safety standards for manufacturers and sellers of electric bicycles to ensure compliance with state regulations.

Who Would Be Affected

The bill would have impacted several groups, including:

  • Electric Bicycle Users: Individuals who own or plan to purchase electric bicycles would have been directly affected by new regulations and classifications.

  • Manufacturers and Retailers: Companies involved in the production and sale of electric bicycles would need to comply with any new safety and registration requirements.

  • Local Governments: Municipalities would need to adapt their transportation policies and infrastructure to accommodate the revised laws regarding electric bicycles.

Legislative Process and Timeline

The legislative journey of SB 387 included several key actions:

  • Introduced and First Reading: The bill was introduced on February 20, 2025, and underwent its first reading on the same day.

  • Committee Review: The bill was referred to the Senate Highways and Transportation Committee, where it passed through various stages, including a committee hearing and executive action.

  • Readings and Amendments: The bill passed its second reading on March 5, 2025, but a motion to amend failed. It was scheduled for a third reading on March 6, 2025, but ultimately failed to pass.

  • Died in Process: The bill was officially recorded as "died in process" on May 23, 2025, indicating that it did not advance to become law.

Conclusion

SB 387 aimed to modernize the legal framework surrounding electric bicycles, promoting their use while ensuring safety and regulatory compliance. Despite its potential benefits, the bill did not progress through the legislative process and ultimately did not become law.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.