WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 8587

Safeguarding Honest Speech Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced by Lauren Boebert and 4 co-sponsors

The bill blocks federal funding from being used to implement or enforce policies requiring staff to use non-legal pronouns or names.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 8587

Summary of HR 8587 (119th Congress)

Title

To prohibit the use of funds to implement, administer, or enforce measures requiring certain employees to refer to an individual by the preferred pronouns of such individual or a name other than the legal name of such individual, and for other purposes.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill seeks to restrict federal or enacted-into-law or agency-use funding from being used to implement, administer, or enforce policies that compel employees to use an individual’s preferred pronouns or a name other than the individual’s legal name.
  • In essence, it aims to prohibit government-related or funded measures that mandate staff to refer to people by pronouns or names that differ from the person’s legal name.

Key provisions and changes (as implied by title and typical structure)

  • Prohibition on funding: No funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce policies requiring employees to use non-legal pronouns or non-legal names.
  • Scope of application: Likely targets federal agencies and programs funded by the federal government, or specific policies within departments, depending on drafting (the bill text would specify which funds and which agencies are affected).
  • Enforcement and penalties: The bill would typically outline consequences for agencies or entities that violate the funding prohibition (e.g., withholding funds, reporting requirements, or other administrative remedies). The specific enforcement mechanism would be in the text.
  • Definitions: The bill would define terms such as “pronouns,” “preferred pronouns,” “legal name,” and “measures” subject to prohibition, to avoid ambiguity.
  • Legislative relation: May include a provision clarifying that nothing in the act alters existing rights or due process protections, or existing state/county/local policies, depending on drafting.

Who would be affected

  • Federal agencies, departments, and contractors that rely on federal funds and that have policies or practices requiring staff to use non-legal pronouns or preferred names.
  • Personnel and human resources offices within covered agencies.
  • Potentially affected employees who interact with the public or colleagues, if the agencies currently follow such pronoun/name policies as part of employee conduct or customer-service standards.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Action history:
    • Introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on April 29, 2026.
  • Next steps (typical for such a bill):
    • Committee review, potential hearings, and markups to amend provisions.
    • If approved, advancement to full House consideration, then potential passage or referral to the Senate (if applicable) and onward to the president for signature or veto.
  • Sponsorship:
    • Primary sponsor not listed in the provided data; co-sponsors include Andrew Clyde, Andy Ogles, Paul Gosar, Lauren Boebert, and Eli Crane.
    • Co-sponsor support may indicate alignment with officeholders favoring restrictions on pronoun/name policies in federal use of funds.

Additional notes

  • Details such as the exact agencies covered, the precise language of the funding prohibition, definitions, and enforcement mechanisms would be found in the full text of the bill. The summary above reflects the bill’s stated purpose and likely structural components based on the title and standard legislative drafting patterns.
  • As introduced and referred to committee, substantive changes would depend on committee actions and any amendments adopted during the legislative process.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.