WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9725

Restoring Integrity and Efficiency to Inspector General Oversight Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced by Andy Biggs and 1 co-sponsor

The bill would abolish CIGIE and shift its coordination, training, and cross-cutting oversight duties to other IGs or bodies.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9725

Overview

HR 9725, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to amend title 5 of the United States Code with the explicit aim of abolishing the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE). The bill is sponsored by Rep. Clay Higgins and Rep. Andy Biggs, with concurrent co-sponsorship noted. It was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 16, 2026.

Main purpose and intent

  • Abolish CIGIE, an independent entity within the federal Inspectors General framework that coordinates activities among the IG community and supports integrity and efficiency initiatives across federal agencies.
  • Repeal or invalidate the statutory basis for CIGIE’s existence and related authorities, processes, and mechanisms established under current law.

Key provisions and changes

  • Elimination of CIGIE: The bill would terminate the existence of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency as an entity and remove its statutory authority.
  • Reassignment of functions: The responsibilities currently performed by CIGIE would need to be redistributed. This could involve transferring functions to individual Inspectors General, to Congress, or to other federal oversight or administrative bodies, depending on statutory redesignations not detailed in the provided synopsis.
  • Administrative and governance implications: With the dissolution of CIGIE, concerns typically addressed by CIGIE—such as coordination among IGs, shared services, training, and policy development—would require alternative arrangements, oversight, or replacement mechanisms.
  • Potential statutory cleanup: The bill may include provisions to adjust related statutory references, definitions, and statutory entities to reflect the absence of CIGIE, though specific text is not provided in the summary.

Who would be affected

  • Federal Inspector General offices: The most directly affected entities, as the central coordinating body for the IG community would be dissolved.
  • Federal agencies with IGs: Agencies that rely on CIGIE for guidance, coordination, and cross-cutting oversight initiatives would experience a change in how these activities are conducted.
  • Congress and federal oversight landscape: Legislative and oversight processes that historically leveraged CIGIE’s framework would need to adapt to the new structure.
  • Employees and stakeholders within the IG ecosystem: Training programs, shared services, and established interagency collaboration mechanisms would undergo changes or discontinuation pending alternate arrangements.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral: The bill was introduced and immediately referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 16, 2026.
  • Next steps (as typical for such bills): The committee would consider, amend, and vote on the bill. If approved, it would move to the full House for debate and a vote, then potentially proceed to the Senate. The timeline depends on committee action, potential amendments, and floor scheduling, as well as any companion Senate activity or negotiations.

Potential implications and considerations

  • Oversight and integrity landscape: Abolishing CIGIE would remove a central coordinating body used to align IG activities and share resources, potentially affecting cross-cutting oversight capabilities.
  • Transition challenges: Absent CIGIE, preserving oversight continuity would require carefully designed successor structures to avoid gaps in coordination, training, and policy dissemination.
  • Fiscal and administrative impact: Depending on how functions are reassigned, there could be costs or savings associated with consolidating or reconfiguring staff, offices, and systems.

Note: This summary is based on the bill’s title, sponsor information, and the action history provided. Full, precise provisions, including specific transition mechanisms and fiscal impacts, would be found in the bill’s statutory text and accompanying committee reports.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.