WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9184

Local Data for Better Conservation Act

119th Congress Introduced by Lauren Boebert and 6 co-sponsors

HR 9184 would change how species are listed under the Endangered Species Act, adjusting criteria, data needs, and procedures for listing protections.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9184

Bill Overview

  • Bill: HR 9184
  • Session: 119
  • Title: To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 with respect to the listing of threatened and endangered species, and for other purposes.
  • Action history: Introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources on June 8, 2026.
  • Sponsors:
    • Co-sponsors: Mike Kennedy, Gabe Evans, Jeff Hurd, Lauren Boebert, Jeff Crank, Troy Downing

Purpose and Intent

HR 9184 seeks to modify the process and criteria by which species are listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. The bill’s main intent appears to shift or constrain how species are designated and listed, potentially altering federal protections, regulatory processes, and related habitat or land-use implications.

Key Provisions (as described by the bill’s title and typical ESA amendment patterns)

While the full text is not provided here, the bill’s focus on “with respect to the listing of threatened and endangered species” suggests several possible areas of change commonly addressed in ESA amendments, such as:

  • Criteria for Listing: Revisions to the scientific and administrative standards used to determine whether a species qualifies as endangered or threatened.
  • Data and Evidence Requirements: Changes to the type or amount of data required to support a listing decision (e.g., emphasis on certain data thresholds, timelines, or potential de-emphasis of speculative or uncertain data).
  • Process and Timing: Adjustments to timelines, comment periods, or deliberation procedures for listing decisions; potential changes to how quickly listings can be enacted or how they are reviewed.
  • Federal vs. State Roles: Shifts in the balance of authority between federal agencies and state/local entities in the listing process.
  • Non-Listing Protections: Provisions that might alter or narrow protections once a species is listed, or create pathways for delisting under certain conditions.
  • Legal Safeguards or Exemptions: Introduction of new exemptions, remedies, or limitations on formal listings or on protections associated with listings.

Note: The exact substantive provisions would be contained in the bill’s text. The summary here reflects the typical scope of ESA-related amendments and the bill’s stated focus on listing of threatened and endangered species.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Species: Potentially affected are species currently listed or candidates for listing under the ESA, as well as species considered for listing in the future.
  • Federal Agencies: Primarily the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and potentially the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), which administer the ESA and carry out listing decisions; procedural changes could affect agency workloads, timelines, and decision-making authority.
  • Private Landowners and Stakeholders: Changes to listing criteria or processes can influence land-use restrictions, permitting, and regulatory burdens on landowners, developers, ranchers, and industry groups.
  • States and Local Governments: If the bill shifts responsibilities or authority, state wildlife agencies and local governments could experience changes in collaboration requirements or regulatory overlap.
  • Conservation Organizations: May be affected by any tightening or loosening of protections, funding, or procedural transparency around listing.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Status: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources (as of June 8, 2026). No floor action or passage information provided here.
  • Implications: Depending on committee action, the bill could advance to full House consideration, potential amendments, and, if passed, conference with the Senate (if different text passes Senate). The timing would depend on legislative calendars and other priorities.

Potential Impacts to Monitor

  • Legal standards: Any concrete changes to statutory criteria for listing could shift the threshold for protection and delisting.
  • Regulatory burden: Alterations in procedural requirements could affect the workload of agencies and the level of regulatory oversight for at-risk species.
  • Conservation outcomes: The balance between species protection and economic or development interests may be affected, depending on how the bill redefines listing prerequisites or exemptions.

Summary

HR 9184 proposes amendments to the Endangered Species Act related to how threatened and endangered species are listed. The bill would likely adjust listing criteria, data requirements, and procedural elements, with downstream effects on federal agencies, landowners, states, and conservation stakeholders. As the bill is currently in committee, additional details from the final text are needed to specify exact provisions, timelines, and impact.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.