No WAR Act

119th Congress Introduced by Becca Balint and 19 co-sponsors

Creates a new budget reconciliation point of order to block budget authority for unauthorized Iran military operations.

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3328)

Overview

Title: To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide for a point of order against reconciliation measures that provide budget authority for unauthorized military operations against Iran, and for other purposes.

Purpose (as stated): Create a procedural tool to block budgetary support within reconciliation measures for military operations against Iran that are not authorized.

Key Provisions and Changes

Point of Order on Reconciliation: Establishes a new point of order within the budget reconciliation process. If a reconciliation measure includes budget authority for military operations against Iran that are unauthorized, the point of order can be raised to challenge and potentially block that provision.

Scope Within Reconciliation: Applies specifically to budget authority elements (e.g., spending, funding, appropriations) within reconciliation bills that pertain to military operations targeting Iran.

Relation to Existing Law: Amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to add this targeted guardrail, aligning with the act’s framework for budget enforcement and impoundment control.

Who/What Would Be Affected

Legislative Process: Reconciliation measures that would authorize or fund military actions against Iran could be subject to a new procedural barrier, potentially preventing such authorizations if a point of order is sustained.

Congressional Consideration: Members proposing or opposing provisions in reconciliation bills involving Iran-related military operations would engage with the new point of order during floor debate.

Executive Branch: Agencies or departments proposing or administering Iran-related military budgets would be indirectly affected, as any such budget authority in a reconciliation bill could face this stricter scrutiny.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

Introduced: April 30, 2026.

Referral: Referred to the House Committee on Rules and the Committee on the Budget for consideration.

Sponsor Details: Primary sponsor not listed in the provided information; two co-sponsors are Val Hoyle and Brendan Boyle.

Action History: As of the provided data, no floor passage or committee report is indicated beyond referral and initial introduction.

Potential Impact and Implications

Budgetary Enforceability: Enhances Congress’s ability to block unauthorized military funding via the budget reconciliation pathway.

Foreign Policy Leverage: Adds a procedural constraint that could influence decisions on Iran-related military operations funded by the federal budget.

Bipartisan Considerations: Given the involvement of two co-sponsors, the bill may attract cross-party attention; however, its exact partisan reception is not indicated here.

Notes

The bill’s text and precise definitions (e.g., what constitutes “unauthorized” operations, and the mechanics of how the point of order is invoked and enforced) are not provided in the summary. For a complete assessment, consulting the bill’s full language and the sponsor’s statements would be necessary.

Bill