Term Limits
Mass. H 3745 requires private used-vehicle sales to use an RMV-approved bill of sale with notarized signatures, odometer, defects, price; excludes under $700; no new private suit.
Mass. H 3745 requires private used-vehicle sales to use an RMV-approved bill of sale with notarized signatures, odometer, defects, price; excludes under $700; no new private suit.
Status and procedural history
- Bill number: H 3745 (House Docket No. 2399). Filed/presented by Rep. David K. Muradian, Jr. (9th Worcester).
- Official title in text: "An Act relative to private sale requirements for used vehicles."
- Filed/introduced: mid-January 2025 (docket shows 1/15–1/16/2025). Legislative records show referral to Committee on Judiciary (1/15/2025) and later to the Committee on Transportation (2/27/2025). A committee hearing was scheduled for 05/13/2025. A study order was accompanied on 11/10/2025. Related/previously similar matter: House No. 3387 (2023–2024); HD 2399 (replaces).
- Note: The bill text included in the packet also contains unrelated South Carolina term‑limits language; that text is not part of the Massachusetts Chapter 90 amendment and appears to be an erroneous insertion.
Purpose and intent
- Establish minimum documentation and procedural requirements for private (non‑dealer) sales of used motor vehicles in Massachusetts to improve consumer protection, reduce fraud, and standardize proof of sale.
Key provisions
1. New statutory placement
- Adds Section 7N3/4 to Chapter 90 of the Massachusetts General Laws (inserted after section 7N1/2).
Definitions (selected)
Required approved bill of sale
Required contents of the bill of sale (must include)
Rulemaking
Exemption
Enforcement and remedies
Who is affected
- Primarily private sellers and buyers of used motor vehicles in Massachusetts (except sales under $700).
- Dealers are explicitly excluded.
- RMV and the Secretary of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (responsible for form creation and rulemaking).
- Potentially impacts informal/private sales (online marketplaces, private-party transactions) by adding a notarization and documentation requirement.
Potential impacts and considerations
- Consumer protection: standardized written record of the sale, odometer disclosure, and disclosure of known safety defects should improve transparency and support enforcement in disputes.
- Increased burden/cost: requirement that both buyer and seller signatures be notarized may add time and expense to private sales, potentially reducing the ease of informal transactions.
- Enforcement nuance: although nonuse is deemed unfair/deceptive, the bill does not create an independent private right of action; courts may weigh noncompliance when awarding damages in other statutory claims.
- Administrative tasks: RMV and the Secretary will need to develop and publish the form and promulgate implementing regulations.
Notes and anomalies
- The bill heading in the packet is labeled "Term Limits" and includes unrelated South Carolina term‑limit draft language. The operative Massachusetts text addresses private sale documentation for used vehicles; readers should treat the South Carolina material as extraneous.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.