WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 398

TAX/TOBACCO TAX: Increases the tax levied on smokeless tobacco and dedicates a portion of avails of the tax into the Youth Cessation and Prevention Fund (OR +$8,900,000 GF RV See Note)

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Ken Brass and 1 co-sponsor

Louisiana increases smokeless tobacco taxes and dedicates ~$8.9M revenue to youth cessation/prevention programs.

Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 398

Legislative bill overview

HB 398 increases Louisiana's tax on smokeless tobacco products and directs a portion of the resulting revenue into a newly established Youth Cessation and Prevention Fund. The bill is expected to generate approximately $8.9 million in general fund revenue. This represents an expansion of tobacco taxation policy beyond cigarettes to include smokeless alternatives like chewing tobacco and snuff.

Why is this important

Smokeless tobacco use remains a significant public health concern, particularly among youth and young adults, despite being less visible in public discourse than cigarette smoking. Dedicating revenue specifically to youth cessation and prevention programs creates a potential dual mechanism: the tax may discourage consumption while generated funds directly support intervention and education efforts. This approach aligns with public health strategies in other states that have implemented similar smokeless tobacco tax increases.

Potential points of contention

  • Regressive tax impact: Tobacco taxes disproportionately affect lower-income consumers, raising fairness concerns about using taxation as a behavioral policy tool
  • Fund adequacy questions: Whether $8.9 million is sufficient to establish meaningful youth cessation programs, or if revenue projections accurately reflect behavioral responses to the tax increase
  • Business impact: Smokeless tobacco retailers and manufacturers may argue the tax creates competitive disadvantages compared to other states with lower tax rates, potentially shifting purchases across state lines

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.