WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 3286

Suffrage; restore to Shanikqua Rena Douglas.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Rod Hickman

SB 3286 aimed to restore suffrage for Shanikqua Rena Douglas; a targeted, one-person restoration that died in committee, leaving no voting-rights change enacted.

Died In Committee
#judiciary #divisionb
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 3286

SB 3286 — Suffrage; restore to Shanikqua Rena Douglas

Overview

SB 3286 proposes to restore voting rights (suffrage) to an individual named Shanikqua Rena Douglas. The bill’s title indicates a targeted approach to reinstate the right to vote for this specific person. The available information does not provide the full text or broader policy provisions beyond this targeted restoration.

Purpose and Intent

  • Primary aim: Restore the suffrage rights of Shanikqua Rena Douglas.
  • Nature: The title implies a one-person restoration rather than a general changes to disenfranchisement law. No additional policy objectives are provided in the available materials.

Key Provisions

  • Text not provided: Specific statutory language, criteria, timelines, or procedural steps are not included in the information provided.
  • Because only the title is known, the exact mechanism (e.g., executive clemency, court-ordered restoration, or legislative authorization) remains unspecified.

Affected Parties

  • Directly: Shanikqua Rena Douglas (the named individual for whom suffrage would be restored).
  • Indirectly: Depending on the bill’s text, potential implications for how similar cases might be handled in the future, though no general policy changes are evident from the available details.

Legislative Timeline and Status

  • Introduced: March 19, 2025
  • Referral: March 19, 2025 to Judiciary, Division B
  • Died in Committee: April 3, 2025
  • Current status: Died in committee; no further advancement in the legislative process on this bill

Context and Next Steps

  • With the bill dead, there is no enacted change to an individual’s voting rights under SB 3286.
  • If reintroduced, proponents could specify the legal mechanism, eligibility criteria, and any broader reforms to suffrage policy.
  • Readers should monitor any future filings or amended versions for updated provisions and potential impact on similar cases.

Notes: The summary reflects only information available from the bill record provided. The absence of the full text means key provisions and statutory details could not be evaluated.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.