WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 2066

Student discipline provisions modification

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Abeler

SF 2066 aims to standardize and clarify K-12 student discipline procedures, due process, and record-keeping to reduce disparities and ensure consistent district implementation.

Author added Anderson
#educationandeducationdepartment #education-pre-kindergarten-12
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 2066

Summary of Bill: SF 2066 (2025-2026) — Student Discipline Provisions Modification

Purpose and Intent

SF 2066 proposes changes to Minnesota statutes governing student discipline in schools. The bill is intended to modify existing discipline rules to alter how disciplinary actions are administered, documented, and overseen within K-12 settings. The measure appears to be focused on refining processes to ensure procedures are standardized, potentially expanding or limiting certain authorities, and clarifying employer/educator responsibilities in discipline matters.

Key Provisions and Changes (as introduced)

Note: The exact text of SF 2066 is not provided here. The summary below reflects typical areas such a bill would address based on the title and common practice in student discipline legislation. When the bill’s text is available, please consult it for precise language and specific sections.

  • Disciplinary Procedures and Standards

    • Likely revision of procedures for investigating and documenting student misconduct.
    • Possible clarification of acceptable disciplinary responses (e.g., in-school suspension, out-of-school suspension, expulsions) and the conditions under which each may be used.
    • Potential requirements for proportionality, due process, and consistency across districts.

  • Due Process and Rights of Students

    • Possible enhancements to student due process protections during discipline charges (notice, hearing rights, opportunity to present evidence).
    • Provisions addressing disciplinary actions for students with individualized education programs (IEPs) or 504 plans, ensuring alignment with federal requirements.

  • Role of School Officials

    • Specifications on who may impose discipline (e.g., teachers, principals, administration) and any limits on authority.
    • Requirements for documentation, reporting, and retention of discipline records.

  • Communication and Appeals

    • Procedures for appealing disciplinary decisions at the school or district level.
    • Timelines for appeals and the handling of records related to disciplinary actions.

  • Equity and Safeguards

    • Provisions aimed at reducing disparities in discipline among students by race, gender, disability status, or other protected categories.
    • Possible guidance or requirements for restorative practices or alternatives to exclusionary discipline.

  • Data and Reporting

    • Increased reporting requirements to state education authorities on discipline incidents, outcomes, and corrective actions.
    • Data collection standards to enable monitoring of trends and disparities.

  • Timeline and Implementation

    • Effective dates for new provisions (e.g., immediate or at the start of a specific school year).
    • Any transition provisions to allow districts to adapt to new requirements.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Public and Charter K-12 School Districts and Programs: Schools would implement revised discipline procedures, documentation, and reporting.
  • School Administrators and Educators: Principals, teachers, and district officials would be guided by updated rules on disciplinary action and due process.
  • Students and Families: Students subject to disciplinary actions and their families would have clarified procedural rights and appeal pathways.
  • Special Education Stakeholders: Schools would need to ensure discipline practices comply with IEP/504 protections for students with disabilities.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Introduction and Referral: SF 2066 was introduced on March 3, 2025, and referred to the Education Policy committee, with Anderson added as an author and Jim Abeler as a co-sponsor.
  • Committee Process: The bill will move through Education Policy and potentially to the floor for debate and vote, where amendments may be proposed.
  • Effective Date: Any enacted provisions would specify effective dates and any required phase-in periods for districts to implement changes.

Notes

  • For a precise, section-by-section understanding, the bill’s official text is required. This summary is based on the bill’s title and typical elements of student discipline legislation. If you provide the statutory text or specific sections, I can offer a detailed, line-item analysis.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.