WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 4152

STO Programs Day in SC

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Terry Alexander and 121 co-sponsors

South Carolina measure is symbolic, designating STO Programs Day to boost public awareness of state savings, ABLE, and unclaimed-property programs.

Introduced and adopted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 4152

Summary — H. 4152 (materials provided contain two distinct measures with the same bill number)

The provided packet includes two separate legislative items labeled H. 4152 in different jurisdictions. Below are concise summaries of each.

A. South Carolina — House Resolution: “STO Programs Day”

Status: Introduced and adopted (House) — March 6, 2025

Purpose
- To designate Wednesday, April 9, 2025, as “STO Programs Day” in South Carolina and to encourage residents, families, and businesses to learn about consumer‑facing programs administered by the State Treasurer’s Office (STO).

Key provisions
- Declares April 9, 2025, as STO Programs Day.
- Encourages public awareness and outreach about STO offerings.
- Requests that a copy of the resolution be presented to Curtis M. Loftis Jr., Treasurer of South Carolina.

Programs highlighted in the resolution (facts cited)
- Future Scholar 529 College Savings Plan: serves over 232,000 families with ~$6.6 billion in assets under management.
- Palmetto ABLE (savings for individuals with disabilities): serves ~3,300 participants statewide.
- South Carolina Unclaimed Property Program: returned $38 million in the last fiscal year and reports roughly $950 million in funds available to claim.

Who is affected / impact
- Symbolic / awareness measure only — no legal, regulatory, or fiscal effects.
- Aims to increase public knowledge and potentially encourage program participation (college savings, ABLE accounts, unclaimed property claims).

Sponsors and procedural notes
- Broadly sponsored in the SC House (long sponsor list). Introduced and adopted by the House on March 6, 2025.

B. Massachusetts — Local Authorization (House No. 4152 / House Docket No. 4731)

Status: Filed/introduced May 20–22, 2025; referred to committee on Municipalities and Regional Government

Purpose
- To authorize the City of Medford to require “institutional master plans” for certain large institutional landholdings, enabling coordinated review and predictable development of institutional facilities.

Key provisions
- Defines an institutional master plan as a land‑use and development plan covering all land owned, leased, or occupied by an institution in the community, identifying growth over multiple years or phases.
- Authorizes the City of Medford, notwithstanding G.L. c. 40A, § 3 (zoning enabling statute) or other law, to adopt local legislation requiring institutional master plan review for:
- hospitals and health care institutions,
- colleges and universities,
- non‑profit educational corporations.
- Purpose statement emphasizes predictable outcomes, coordinated development, and municipal review/approval.
- Effective upon passage (if enacted).

Who is affected / impact
- Affects institutional property owners/occupants in Medford (hospitals, higher‑education institutions, non‑profit schools).
- Impacts Medford’s land‑use review process — institutions may need to prepare comprehensive master plans and submit them for municipal review and approval.
- Potential benefits: coordinated campus planning, clearer mitigation of impacts, public engagement and predictability for neighbors.
- Potential burdens: additional planning and administrative requirements for institutions; increased municipal review workload.

Procedural notes & sponsors
- Filed by Rep. Christine P. Barber with cosponsors Sean Garballey, Paul J. Donato, and Patricia D. Jehlen.
- Local approval noted (approval of Medford mayor and city council is referenced).
- Referred to Municipalities and Regional Government committee (May 22, 2025); further hearings/reporting dates shown in docket materials.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a side‑by‑side comparison of impacts (symbolic resolution vs. regulatory local act),
- Draft a short memo on likely implementation steps Medford would need to adopt institutional master plan rules, or
- Extract timeline and next actions for the Massachusetts bill.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.