WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 1006

State Universities - As introduced, expands the list of those who are prohibited from serving on a state university board to include those who hold the position of a member of a governing body for another institution of higher education, not just public institutions of higher education. - Amends TCA Title 4, Chapter 29; Title 49, Chapter 7; Title 49, Chapter 8 and Title 49, Chapter 9.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by David Hawk

Prohibits state university board members from simultaneously serving on any higher education institution's governing body, expanding conflict-of-interest restrictions beyond public universities.

Taken off notice for cal. in Education Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1006

Legislative bill overview

HB 1006 expands conflict-of-interest restrictions for state university board members by prohibiting simultaneous service on governing bodies of any institution of higher education, not just other public institutions. Previously, board members could serve on private college or university boards while serving on a public university board; this bill closes that loophole.

Why is this important

University board members wield significant influence over budgets, hiring, accreditation, and strategic direction. Restricting dual service reduces potential conflicts of interest where a board member might favor one institution over another or create divided loyalties. This affects governance quality and public trust in how state higher education systems are managed.

Potential points of contention

  • Private institution impact: Private colleges and universities may lose access to experienced board members who currently hold state university positions, potentially weakening their governance quality
  • Definition of "governing body": Unclear whether this applies only to voting board seats or also to advisory committees, which could broadly restrict participation
  • Talent pool concerns: Tennessee may limit its pool of qualified board candidates, particularly in rural areas where governance leadership overlaps between educational institutions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.