WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 4273

State Patrol compensation study requirements modification

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by John Hoffman and 1 co-sponsor

Minnesota bill adjusts how State Patrol compensation studies are conducted and reported, affecting officer pay benchmarking and recruitment policy decisions.

Rule 45-amend, subst. General Orders HF4102, SF indefinitely postponed
#publicsafetyandpublicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4273

Legislative bill overview

SF 4273 modifies the State Patrol compensation study requirements in Minnesota by adjusting how the state examines and reports on trooper pay levels. The bill alters existing statutory language governing periodic reviews of State Patrol compensation compared to other law enforcement agencies and private sector benchmarks.

Why is this important

State Patrol compensation directly affects recruitment, retention, and operational capacity of highway enforcement. Study requirements ensure data-driven decision-making on officer salaries, which represent a significant portion of transportation budgets and impact public safety services. Changes to study methodology or frequency can delay or accelerate policy responses to compensation gaps.

Potential points of contention

  • Study scope modifications: Unclear whether changes narrow or broaden comparative benchmarks (other agencies, regions, private sector), affecting whether pay recommendations appear generous or inadequate
  • Frequency and timing: Adjusting how often studies occur could either improve responsiveness to market conditions or reduce oversight of compensation adequacy
  • Implementation costs: Modifying study requirements may increase or decrease fiscal impact on state budgets and state patrol operations

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.