WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 10

State-funded payments to undocumented noncitizens prohibited, and undocumented noncitizens provided to be ineligible for MinnesotaCare and North Star Promise scholarship program.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Keith Allen and 31 co-sponsors

Bars undocumented immigrants from MinnesotaCare health insurance and North Star Promise scholarships, eliminating state-funded benefits for those lacking federal immigration authorization.

Committee report, to adopt as amended and re-refer to Ways and Means
#education-higher #governmentaloperations-state #healthandhealthdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 10

Legislative bill overview

HF 10 would prohibit state-funded payments to undocumented noncitizens and explicitly bar them from enrolling in MinnesotaCare (a state health insurance program) and the North Star Promise scholarship program (which provides free college tuition). The bill narrows eligibility for these two major state benefit programs to citizens and authorized residents only.

Why is this important

These programs currently serve low-income Minnesotans and students with demonstrated financial need. The bill would affect current beneficiaries and applicants who lack federal immigration authorization, potentially removing health coverage from thousands and eliminating educational access for undocumented students. This represents a significant policy shift regarding state resource allocation and who qualifies as eligible for publicly funded services.

Potential points of contention

  • Healthcare access and public health: Removing undocumented immigrants from MinnesotaCare could increase emergency room usage and reduce preventive care, affecting broader health outcomes and hospital finances
  • Economic and workforce implications: Restricting access to education programs may limit workforce development in fields where undocumented workers participate, potentially affecting labor supply and business operations
  • Constitutional and federal law questions: Courts have previously blocked similar restrictions on healthcare and education benefits; legal challenges regarding equal protection and federal preemption are likely
  • Implementation challenges: Determining and verifying immigration status for eligibility creates administrative costs and privacy concerns for program administration

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.