WeVote

Bill

Bill

HR 1796

State departments and agencies responsible for the management of public funds; review and divest from investments in Israeli bonds; urge

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Eric Bell and 4 co-sponsors

Georgia state agencies must review how public funds are managed and divest from Israeli-bond investments.

House Second Readers
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 1796

Summary of HR 1796 (Session 2025-26, Georgia)

Purpose and intent

HR 1796 aims to require state departments and agencies in Georgia to review their management of public funds and to divest from investments in Israeli bonds. The resolution/house bill urges state entities to examine current investment holdings and to take steps toward divestment where such investments exist, with the stated goal of aligning public funds management with a policy position on Israeli bonds.

Key provisions and changes

  • Scope of review: Directs state departments and agencies responsible for public funds to conduct an official review of how they manage, invest, and allocate public money.
  • Divestment directive: Requires actions to divest from investments tied to Israeli bonds, subject to the review findings and applicable legal constraints.
  • Process and reporting: Establishes a process for identifying Israeli-bond investments and for implementing divestment steps. Likely includes reporting requirements on findings and actions taken.
  • Coordination and oversight: May designate a lead agency or offices to coordinate the review and divestment effort, and to monitor compliance across state entities.
  • Timeline considerations: The bill implies a timeframe for completing the review and initiating divestment actions, though exact dates are not specified in the available text.

Who would be affected

  • State government entities: All Georgia state departments and agencies that manage public funds and investments would be involved in the review and potential divestment.
  • Public funds managers: Investment offices, treasuries, retirement systems, and any other state-financed fund managers would implement the review process and divestment actions.
  • Taxpayers and beneficiaries: Citizens and beneficiaries of state services affected indirectly through changes in public funds management and potential implications for state investment risk, returns, or administrative overhead.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Legislative status: The bill has progressed through initial readings and is in a stage where it is moving through the House for consideration (as indicated by “House Second Readers” and “House First Readers” dates in March 2026).
  • Sponsor details: The bill has several co-sponsors, including El-Mahdi Holly, Park Cannon, Bryce Berry, Ruwa Romman, and Eric Bell, signaling cross-member support.
  • Next steps: If enacted, the affected agencies would implement the review and divestment plan in accordance with any specified deadlines or interim reporting requirements, and the bill would likely require subsequent regulatory or administrative actions to operationalize divestment.

Practical implications and considerations

  • Investment impact: Divestment from Israeli bonds could affect portfolio composition, risk/return profiles, and liquidity considerations for public funds.
  • Legal and fiduciary review: Agencies would need to ensure compliance with fiduciary duties and other state and federal laws governing investments.
  • Policy alignment: The measure ties public funds management to a specific geopolitical stance, which could have broader political and international relation implications within the state’s procurement and investment policies.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to a specific audience (e.g., policymakers, public financial officers, or the general public) or add more detail on potential fiscal impacts and implementation steps once the bill’s full text is available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.