WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1308

St. Paul; blighted property redevelopment funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Samakab Hussein

State funds blighted-property redevelopment in St. Paul, issues bonds, and makes appropriations to spur neighborhood renewal and affect local debt service.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment
#bonds #citiesandtowns-specific #realestate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1308

Summary of HF 1308 — St. Paul blighted property redevelopment funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated

Overview

  • Bill number: HF 1308
  • Title: St. Paul; blighted property redevelopment funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated
  • Status: Introduction and first reading; referred to the Capital Investment committee
  • Introduced: February 20, 2025
  • Related bill (companion): SF 1927

HF 1308 is a House file proposing state support for redevelopment of blighted properties in St. Paul through financing and appropriations. The bill’s title indicates the core actions: providing funding for redevelopment, authorizing the issuance of bonds, and making appropriations to support these activities. The fiscal and programmatic specifics are not included in the provided information.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill aims to facilitate redevelopment of blighted properties within the city of St. Paul.
  • It contemplates financing this redevelopment through the issuance of bonds and by making targeted appropriations.
  • The overarching goal is to leverage state resources to spur redevelopment, improve neighborhoods, and address blight in St. Paul.

Key provisions (as indicated by the bill’s title)

  • Funding authorization: Provision of state funds for redevelopment projects focused on blighted properties in St. Paul.
  • Bond issuance: Authorization to issue bonds to finance the redevelopment activities outlined in the bill.
  • Appropriations: Specific money appropriated to support the redevelopment efforts (the exact amounts and programs would be detailed in the bill text or fiscal notes).

Note: The available information does not provide line-item details, program structure, eligibility criteria, match requirements, funding caps, or debt-service terms. Those particulars would appear in the bill’s text and any accompanying fiscal note.

Who/what would be affected

  • City of St. Paul: Primary beneficiary through access to state funds and bonding support for blighted-property redevelopment.
  • Blighted properties and neighborhoods in St. Paul: Potential sites for redevelopment funded by the bill.
  • State finance and debt portfolio: Introduction of bond authorization would impact state debt issuance and debt-service planning.
  • Developers, property owners, and redevelopment authorities: Potential project partners or participants in funded redevelopment efforts.
  • Taxpayers and voters: Ultimately responsible for debt service associated with bonds, depending on the bond mechanism used.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Current stage: Introduction and first reading in the Minnesota House; assigned to the Capital Investment committee.
  • Next steps: We expect committee hearings, possible amendments, committee passage, and then floor consideration in the House. A Senate companion (SF 1927) suggests parallel consideration in the Senate with eventual reconciliation if both chambers pass different versions.
  • Key dates to watch: Any committee dates, fiscal notes, and schedule changes as the bill progresses.

Fiscal and policy implications (high-level)

  • The bill would create a state debt obligation via bonds to finance redevelopment.
  • It would redirect or allocate state funds toward blighted-property projects in St. Paul, potentially affecting local economies, property values, and urban renewal efforts.
  • Full fiscal impact, including debt-service costs and annual budget effects, would be clarified in the bill’s fiscal note and subsequent amendments.

Additional notes

  • The exact structure, eligibility criteria, matching requirements, reporting, oversight provisions, and project timelines will be defined in the bill text and any accompanying fiscal analysis. The companion Senate bill SF 1927 should be reviewed for parallel provisions and timing.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.