WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 798

Spalding County; State Court; modernize, update, and readopt provisions

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Beth Camp and 1 co-sponsor

HB 798 aimed to repeal the ban on same-sex marriage, granting equal legal rights and recognition to same-sex couples, but the bill ultimately died in committee.

Effective Date
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 798

Summary of HB 798: Constitutional Amendment Repealing the Ban on Same-Sex Marriage

Bill Overview

Bill Number: HB 798
Title: Constitutional amendment repealing the ban on same-sex marriage
Status: Died in Process
Introduced: December 17, 2024
Classification: Bill
Subject: Constitutional Amendment Proposals, Family Law

Purpose and Intent

The primary intent of HB 798 was to propose a constitutional amendment that would repeal existing provisions banning same-sex marriage. This legislative effort aimed to align state law with evolving societal norms and judicial interpretations regarding marriage equality, thereby ensuring that same-sex couples would have the same legal recognition and rights as opposite-sex couples.

Key Provisions

  • Repeal of Ban: The bill sought to eliminate any constitutional language that explicitly prohibited same-sex marriage, thereby allowing same-sex couples to marry legally.
  • Legal Equality: By repealing the ban, the bill aimed to provide equal marriage rights to all couples, irrespective of gender, ensuring that same-sex marriages would be recognized and afforded the same legal protections as heterosexual marriages.

Impact

If passed, HB 798 would have had significant implications for:
- Same-Sex Couples: The repeal would have granted same-sex couples the legal right to marry, access to spousal benefits, and recognition in family law matters.
- Family Law: The amendment would have necessitated changes in various legal frameworks surrounding marriage, adoption, and family rights, promoting equality in family law.

Legislative Process and Timeline

  • December 17, 2024: Bill introduced and drafter assigned.
  • February 26, 2025: Bill referred to the Judiciary Committee and received its first reading.
  • February 28, 2025: A hearing was scheduled in the Judiciary Committee.
  • March 3, 2025: The scheduled hearing was canceled.
  • March 24, 2025: The bill was tabled in the Judiciary Committee.
  • April 7, 2025: The bill missed the deadline for referendum proposal transmittal.
  • May 20, 2025: The bill ultimately died in the legislative process.

Conclusion

HB 798 represented a significant legislative attempt to advance marriage equality by repealing the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Despite its introduction and initial steps through the legislative process, the bill did not progress to a vote and ultimately died in committee, reflecting ongoing challenges in the pursuit of marriage equality at the state level.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.