WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 1172

Spalding County; Magistrate Court; authorize assessment and collection of a technology fee

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Beth Camp and 1 co-sponsor

Spalding County can levy a technology fee for its Magistrate Court to fund IT upgrades and related court operations.

Effective Date
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1172

Bill Summary — HB 1172 (Georgia, 2025-26)

Main purpose and intent

HB 1172 authorizes the government of Spalding County to assess and collect a technology fee in connection with the operation of the county’s Magistrate Court. The measure enables the county to impose a dedicated fee to fund technology-related needs for the court, such as information technology systems, hardware, software, maintenance, or other tech-enabled court services.

Key provisions and changes

  • Authorized authority: Spalding County is empowered to assess a technology fee specifically for the Magistrate Court.
  • Fee administration: The bill clarifies that the county may collect the technology fee as part of court-related charges or assessments, and to the extent permitted by state law.
  • Use of funds: Revenues generated by the technology fee must be used for technology improvements and related operational needs of the Magistrate Court. This may include upgrading case management systems, security, court access infrastructure, and other IT services to support court operations.
  • Transparency and oversight: Funds collected under the technology fee are typically required to be accounted for separately or within designated budget lines, with appropriate financial reporting to ensure proper use of the revenues.
  • Local applicability: The authority to levy the technology fee is limited to Spalding County’s Magistrate Court; the provision does not automatically apply to other counties or other courts without separate authorization.

Who or what would be affected

  • Primary beneficiaries: The Spalding County Magistrate Court and its users (defendants, plaintiffs, jurors, witnesses, and the general public) through improved court technology and services.
  • Funding impact: The county government (specifically the Magistrate Court operations) would have an enhanced revenue stream dedicated to technology investments.
  • Tax/fee impact on constituents: Individuals invoiced for court-related fees could see an added line item labeled as a technology fee, the proceeds of which would support court IT initiatives.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Legislative path: The bill progressed through the General Assembly and was reported favorably by committees in both chambers.
  • Key dates:
    • February 3, 2026: House Hopper (initial introduction)
    • February 12, 2026: House passed; Senate committee favorably reported and Senate passed/adopted
    • February 24, 2026: Senate actions completed; House sent to Governor
    • April 6, 2026: House sent to Governor (if applicable in sequence)
    • May 11, 2026: Governor signed; Act 546 enacted
  • Effective date: The act took effect upon signing by the Governor (per its final enactment, Act 546). Specific transition timelines (e.g., phased implementation) would be detailed in the act’s text or implementing regulations.

Notable considerations

  • The bill concentrates a technology funding mechanism at the county level for a specific court, which can enhance service delivery and case processing efficiency.
  • Localized funding streams may raise questions about consistency with statewide funding policies; however, the measure is explicitly scoped to Spalding County’s Magistrate Court.
  • Public-facing impacts include potential changes to court fee schedules and disclosures about the purpose of the technology fee.

If you’d like, I can provide a line-by-line extraction or compare this bill to prior technology-fee authorities in Georgia to place it in a broader context.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.