WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 867

Slayton; 34th Street reconstruction funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Schomacker

HF 867 authorizes bonds and state funds to finance the reconstruction of 34th Street in Slayton, covering design, construction, and related costs.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment
#bonds #citiesandtowns-specific #highways #roads #andbridges
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 867

Summary of HF 867 (2025-2026) – Slayton; 34th Street Reconstruction Funding Provided, Bonds Issued, and Money Appropriated

Overview

HF 867 proposes funding for the reconstruction of 34th Street in Slayton, Minnesota. The bill authorizes the issuance of bonds to finance the project and appropriates the necessary money to ensure construction and related costs are covered. The bill has been introduced and referred to the Capital Investment committee, with Joe Schomacker as a co-sponsor.

Purpose and Intent

  • Provide a financial framework to reconstruct 34th Street in Slayton, addressing infrastructure needs, safety, and improved transportation access.
  • Enable timely project execution by authorizing bonded debt and designating state funds to support construction.

Key Provisions and Changes

Bonding Authorization

  • The bill authorizes the issuance of state bonds to finance all or a portion of the 34th Street reconstruction project in Slayton.
  • Terms, maturity, and interest rate structure would be defined in the bond authorization section (not specified in the summary provided).

Appropriation and Funding

  • Direct appropriation of funds to support the project, potentially including:
    • Design and engineering costs
    • Right-of-way acquisition (if applicable)
    • Construction costs
    • Construction contingency
    • Related project expenses (e.g., utility adjustments, landscaping, sidewalk/pedestrian improvements)
  • The funding package is intended to cover the total project cost or the state’s share as determined by the plan.

Project Scope (as implied)

  • Reconstruction of 34th Street in Slayton, which may encompass roadway resurfacing, full or partial redevelopment, drainage improvements, and safety enhancements (e.g., crosswalks, signals, lighting). Specific design elements would be detailed in the project plan and accompanying fiscal note.

Governance and Reporting

  • Typical provisions would require the Department of Transportation (or the relevant state agency) to oversee design and construction, with oversight by the Legislature and/or infusing reporting requirements to track spend, milestones, and compliance with procurement rules.
  • Bond issuance would be subject to relevant state finance law and appropriation terms.

Who Would Be Affected

Primary Beneficiaries

  • Residents and businesses in Slayton, Minnesota, who rely on 34th Street for travel, commerce, and access to services.
  • Municipal and county partners involved in the project, including any local utility providers impacted by construction.

Financial and Fiscal Impacts

  • State finances: The project would increase state debt through bonds and commit appropriation authority.
  • Local governments: Potential cost-sharing or matching requirements, depending on the project’s funding model and any local contribution provisions.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Introduction and First Reading: February 17, 2025.
  • Next Steps: Referral to the Capital Investment committee for analysis, potential committee hearings, and fiscal note development.
  • Final Action: To be determined; would require committee approval, advancement to the full House, and possible Senate consideration, followed by a signature by the governor.

Notes

  • The summary reflects the information available from the bill’s current introduction and action history. Specific dollar figures, bond terms, project milestones, and local cost-sharing details would be outlined in the bill’s fiscal note and subsequent amendments.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to focus on particular aspects (e.g., fiscal implications, local impact, or project timeline) or compare HF 867 to prior Slayton infrastructure funding measures.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.