WeVote

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 2524

Summary of SF 2524 — Shotgun zone for taking deer elimination provision

Overview

SF 2524 is a Minnesota Senate bill introduced on March 13, 2025, with the title “Shotgun zone for taking deer elimination provision.” The bill appears to address firearm use in a specific “shotgun zone” related to a deer elimination provision, aligning with topics in firearms and weapons, hunting and game, and natural resources. The current status shows that authors Howe and Wesenberg were added to the measure on March 17, 2025. The bill was referred to the Environment, Climate, and Legacy committee on introduction.

Legislative history and status

  • Introduction: March 13, 2025
  • Initial action: Referred to Environment, Climate, and Legacy (March 13, 2025)
  • Authors added: Howe; Wesenberg (March 17, 2025)
  • Related companion bill: HF 625 (House of Representatives)

What the bill would do (as far as can be determined from available information)

  • Based on the title, SF 2524 would create or modify a “shotgun zone” related to taking deer under an elimination provision. This suggests a framework to specify where and how shotguns may be used for deer elimination under certain conditions.
  • The specifics of the zone (geographic boundaries), the criteria for eligibility, the season or timing, restrictions, permit requirements, safety standards, enforcement mechanisms, and penalties are not provided in the summary data available here. The text of the bill would be needed to enumerate exact provisions.
  • The bill falls under subject areas including firearms and weapons, hunting and game, and the state's natural resources framework, indicating potential coordination with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and related regulatory and enforcement processes.

Who would be affected

  • Hunters and landowners within Minnesota who participate in deer management or elimination activities that fall under the proposed shotgun zone.
  • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and law enforcement agencies responsible for implementing, monitoring, and enforcing the new provisions.
  • Potentially other stakeholders in wildlife management, habitat conservation, and public safety groups depending on the zone’s scope and restrictions.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • The bill has been introduced and referred to a committee (Environment, Climate, and Legacy) for consideration.
  • The addition of authors Howe and Wesenberg indicates sponsor expansion and potential broadening of support.
  • The companion bill HF 625 in the House may provide a parallel path for consideration and eventual convergence on identical or similar language.

Notes and next steps

  • The current summary lacks the bill’s exact text and detailed provisions. For a precise understanding of the shotgun zone’s geographic scope, seasons, eligibility, safety requirements, penalties, funding, and implementation timeline, the official bill language and analysis should be consulted.
  • If you want, I can help track the bill’s progress, summarize committee amendments, or compare SF 2524 with HF 625 once the full texts are available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.