WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 956

Searches and seizures without a warrant or court order by conservation officers prohibition and requiring receipts to be provided for persons from whom property is seized

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Steve Drazkowski and 4 co-sponsors

Bill prohibits warrantless searches by conservation officers and mandates seizure receipts, restricting wildlife enforcement tools currently used to combat poaching and resource violations.

Referred to Environment, Climate, and Legacy
#lawenforcement #naturalresourcesandnaturalresourcesdepartment #publicsafetyandpublicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 956

Legislative bill overview

SF 956 prohibits Minnesota conservation officers from conducting searches and seizures without a warrant or court order, and requires them to provide receipts documenting any property they seize. This bill would apply Fourth Amendment-style protections to wildlife and natural resource enforcement actions that currently operate under different legal standards.

Why is this important

Conservation officers currently operate under administrative search authority that allows warrantless inspections of hunting/fishing activities and related property—a practice that differs from typical law enforcement. This bill would significantly restrict those enforcement tools and require documentation procedures, potentially affecting how the state manages wildlife violations, poaching, and natural resource crimes.

Potential points of contention

  • Enforcement impact: Conservation officers argue warrantless searches are essential for effective wildlife protection and poaching prevention; requiring warrants could delay time-sensitive interventions
  • Legal precedent: Administrative searches in environmental/regulatory enforcement have long been upheld differently than criminal searches; this reverses established doctrine
  • Resource burden: Mandatory receipt procedures and warrant requirements could strain conservation officer resources and slow response to violations
  • Practical application: Ambiguity about what constitutes a "seizure" of natural resources (fish, game, equipment) and when warrants would be obtainable in remote areas

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.