WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 4686

School district levy amounts made eligible for school building bond agricultural credit.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Greg Davids and 2 co-sponsors

Expands the agricultural credit for school building bonds to include school district levy amounts.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Taxes
#education-schooldistricts #taxation
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 4686

Summary: HF 4686 (Minnesota, 2025-2026) – School District Levy Amounts Eligible for School Building Bond Agricultural Credit

Overview

HF 4686 proposes adjusting or expanding the eligibility criteria for the agricultural credit related to school building bonds. Specifically, the bill connects school district levy amounts to eligibility for the school building bond agricultural credit, with the aim of clarifying how agricultural land and activities interact with bond-related credits used to fund school facilities.

  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Title: School district levy amounts made eligible for school building bond agricultural credit
  • Introduced / First Reading: March 25, 2026
  • Committee: Taxes (referred; initial action)
  • Sponsors:
    • Greg Davids (Co-sponsor)
    • Bianca Virnig (Co-sponsor)
    • Chris Swedzinski (Co-sponsor)

Note: The bill text is not provided here, so the summary reflects the bill’s stated title and the typical scope of such provisions in Minnesota tax policy. The actual bill text should be consulted for precise definitions, eligibility criteria, and numerical thresholds.

Purpose and Intent

  • Main Objective: Align and/or expand eligibility for the school building bond agricultural credit to include school district levy amounts. The intent is to recognize school district levies as qualifying inputs for the agricultural credit associated with school building bonds, potentially affecting how agricultural property owners or districts claim or allocate credits.
  • Policy Rationale (inferred):
    • Streamline treatment of agricultural credits in relation to school bond funding.
    • Provide clearer or broader access to credits for entities involved in financing or benefiting from school building bonds within agricultural districts or properties.
    • Potentially reduce the net cost burden on agricultural landowners or districts linked to school infrastructure financing.

Key Provisions (Inferred Based on Title)

Because the full bill text is not provided, the following provisions are inferred from the title and typical legislative practice:

  • Adjustment of Eligibility: The agricultural credit for school building bonds would extend to include school district levy amounts as eligible for the credit computation or qualification.
  • Definitions and Scope:
    • Definition of “school district levy” for purposes of the agricultural credit.
    • Clarification of what constitutes a “school building bond” and related credits (e.g., how interest, principal, or levy portions are treated).
  • Credit Calculation:
    • How levy amounts impact the calculation of the agricultural credit (e.g., credit percentage, cap, or carryover rules).
  • Administration:
    • Responsibilities for verification, reporting, and compliance on levy-backed credits.
    • Possible alignment with existing Minnesota Department of Revenue administration of agricultural tax credits and with the process for school building bonds.

Affected Parties and Impacts

  • Beneficiaries:
    • Agricultural property owners and operators who interact with school building bonds within Minnesota.
    • School districts seeking to utilize or optimize agricultural credits tied to levies or bonds.
  • Political Subdivision/Local Government:
    • School districts issuing bonds and levying taxes within agricultural regions may be affected by changes in credit eligibility, potentially influencing financing strategies.
  • Tax Administration:
    • Minnesota Department of Revenue (or relevant tax authorities) would administer and enforce the revised eligibility rules, including compliance and reporting.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: The bill was introduced and referred to the Taxes committee on March 25, 2026.
  • Next Steps (Typical):
    • Tax committee hearings and potential amendments.
    • Floor debate and passage in the Minnesota House (and subsequent Senate, if aligned with bicameral process).
    • Possible gubernatorial action after passage.

Notes for Readiness

  • Access the full bill text to confirm:
    • Exact statutory language to be amended or added.
    • Numerical thresholds, caps, or percentages governing the credit.
    • Specific definitions for “school district levy” and “school building bond.”
    • Effective date and any transitional provisions (e.g., phasing-in, applicability to prior levies or bonds).
  • Consider fiscal impact analyses, including how the change would affect state revenue or local tax burdens, and any potential interplay with other credits or deductions.

If you’d like, I can refine this summary once the official bill text is available to extract precise definitions, thresholds, and effective dates.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.