WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1604

School attendance mandated to a local welfare agency, habitual truant definition modified, and money appropriated for grants to fund child welfare response efforts.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Bianca Virnig

The bill shifts attendance issues to local welfare agencies, revises habitual truancy criteria, and funds grants to bolster child welfare responses tied to student attendance.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Children and Families Finance and Policy
#educationandeducationdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1604

Summary of HF 1604 (Minnesota) – 2025-2026 Session

Overview

HF 1604 seeks to reform how school attendance interacts with local welfare and child welfare systems. The bill includes three core areas:
1) mandate that school attendance matters be routed to a local welfare agency,
2) modify the definition of habitual truancy,
3) appropriate funds to support grants for child welfare response efforts.

Sponsored in the House with Bianca Virnig listed as a co-sponsor. The bill was introduced and referred to the Children and Families Finance and Policy committee on February 26, 2025.

1) Main Purpose and Intent

  • Align school attendance concerns with local welfare agency involvement to improve coordination and responsiveness to at-risk students and families.
  • Update the criteria used to classify a student as habitually truant, potentially expanding or refining the threshold and process.
  • Provide targeted funding to establish or support grants that fund child welfare response efforts related to school attendance and student welfare.

2) Key Provisions and Changes

  • School Attendance routed to local welfare agency:

    • Reforms the process by which schools handle attendance problems by ensuring cases are referred to the designated local welfare agency (likely the county or city welfare or child welfare agency).
    • Aims to leverage welfare resources and case management for students with chronic attendance issues.

  • Habitual truancy definition modification:

    • Alters the statutory definition of habitual truancy.
    • Could involve changes to the number of unexcused absences or the time period used to determine truancy, and may adjust reporting or intervention requirements for schools and families.

  • Grants for child welfare response efforts:

    • Authorizes or appropriates funds to create or fund grant programs aimed at enhancing child welfare responses related to attendance, safety, and well-being.
    • Grants may be used for services such as outreach, case management, family support, or collaboration with schools.

(Note: Specific statutory language, threshold numbers (e.g., days of absence), grant amounts, and eligible applicants are not provided in the provided summary and would be detailed in the bill text.)

3) Who or What Would Be Affected

  • Students and Families:

    • Students with attendance challenges who come into contact with schools and welfare systems could experience more coordinated interventions.
    • Families could be subject to new processes for addressing truancy through welfare agency involvement.

  • Schools and School Districts:

    • Schools would refer cases to local welfare agencies rather than handling certain attendance issues internally, changing case management workflows and reporting requirements.

  • Local Welfare/Child Welfare Agencies:

    • Agencies would assume a larger role in attendance-related interventions, case management, and coordination with schools.

  • Grant Recipients:

    • Organizations applying for and receiving grants to support child welfare response efforts connected to attendance.

4) Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral:

    • Introduced and first read on February 26, 2025.
    • Referred to the House committee: Children and Families Finance and Policy.

  • Next Steps (as typical in Minnesota process):

    • The bill would undergo committee hearings, potential amendments, and votes in committee.
    • If advanced, it would proceed to floor debate in the House, and then potentially to the Senate and governor for enactment, subject to the standard legislative calendar.

Potential Impacts to Monitor

  • How the habitual truancy definition changes may affect school discipline, state mandates, and district policies.
  • The exact mechanisms for referral to local welfare agencies (timelines, notification, confidentiality, and consent).
  • The scope and administration of the proposed grants (eligibility, funding level, reporting requirements, and expected outcomes).
  • Any cost implications for state and local governments, schools, and welfare agencies.

For a complete understanding, review the bill’s full text, including definitions, thresholds for truancy, referral procedures, grant program parameters, funding amounts, and implementation timelines once available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.