WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 477

Retirement Death Benefits Rewrite.

2025-2026 Session Introduced by Garland Pierce and 3 co-sponsors

HB 477 standardizes and consolidates North Carolina death benefits into a single trust framework to strengthen and separate funding for survivor and line-of-duty benefits.

Signed by Gov. 6/13/2025
#cjrs;death&dying;deathbenefits;funds&accounts;generalassembly;insurance;insurance #life;judges;lgers;localgovernment;lrs;magistrates;presented;public;ratified;retirement;salaries&benefits;stateemployees;teachers;tsers;chaptered;governmentemployees;localgovernmentemployees
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 477

HB 477 — “Retirement Death Benefits Rewrite” (Session Law 2025‑11)

Status: Enacted and signed by the Governor (6/13/2025)
Introduced: November 12, 2024 (House sponsor(s): Carson Smith et al.)
Primary subject areas: retirement systems, death benefits, line‑of‑duty benefits, State and local government employees, teachers, judges

Purpose / Intent

HB 477 recodifies, standardizes, and clarifies the statutory framework governing death benefits provided under multiple North Carolina public retirement systems. The bill reorganizes disparate provisions into a single, modernized statutory structure, aligns survivor benefit provisions across systems, and creates a trust structure intended to ensure reliable funding for death and line‑of‑duty death benefits.

Key provisions

  • Creates a new Article 8 in Chapter 135, “Death Benefit Plan for State Employees and Retirees,” composed of G.S. 135‑153 through G.S. 135‑200. These sections consolidate and recodify prior statutory language governing death benefits.
  • Establishes the North Carolina Teachers’ and State Employees’ Benefit Trust (the “Benefit Trust”) as a master trust to receive receipts, transfers, appropriations, contributions, investment earnings, and other income related to participating death/disability benefit plans.
    • The Boards of Trustees of the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System (TSERS) and the Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System (LGERS) serve as trustees.
    • Funds for each participating plan are to be separately accounted for within the trust and may not be commingled or used to pay liabilities of another participating plan.
  • Defines “participating plans” to include the Death Benefit Plan, the Local Governmental Death Benefit Plan, contributory death benefits for retired members of the Consolidated Judicial Retirement System and the Legislative Retirement System, and the Separate Insurance Benefits Plan.
  • Recodifies many existing statutory sentences and subsections into the new Article to improve clarity and uniformity (e.g., prior G.S. sections and subsections are reallocated into the new G.S. 135‑154, 135‑155, 135‑160, etc.).
  • Standardizes treatment of the survivor’s alternate benefit across the affected retirement systems (text codifying these changes is embedded in the new Article and related edits).
  • Directs that Benefit Trust assets be used exclusively for the benefit of plan members, participants, and beneficiaries and for reasonable administrative costs—explicitly protecting trust assets from distribution to non‑plan entities.

Who is affected

  • Members, survivors, and beneficiaries of TSERS, LGERS, the Consolidated Judicial Retirement System, the Legislative Retirement System, and the Separate Insurance Benefits Plan.
  • State and local government employers, retirement system administrators, and the TSERS and LGERS Boards of Trustees (as trustees of the Benefit Trust).
  • Actuarial, accounting, and legal staff who will implement the recodified procedures and reporting.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Bill went through multiple committee substitutes and amendments in the 2025 session, passed both chambers, was ratified and enrolled, and was signed by the Governor on June 13, 2025 (Session Law 2025‑11).
  • The act primarily performs statutory recodification and administrative restructuring; where substantive changes (e.g., survivor benefit formulas or funding rules) were made, implementation will require plan administration updates and actuarial review.

Potential impacts

  • Administrative: systems will need to update internal rules, forms, actuarial certifications, and accounting to reflect the consolidated trust and recodified statutory references.
  • Financial/funding: creation of the Benefit Trust and separation of accounts is intended to strengthen and clarify funding for death and line‑of‑duty benefits; no specific fiscal figures are provided in the text excerpts, but actuarial work will be required to verify sufficiency and ongoing contributions.
  • Legal/benefit outcomes: the standardization and clarification may change how certain survivor/alternate benefits are determined or administered; affected members and beneficiaries should review notices once agencies publish implementing guidance.

If you want, I can:
- Extract the specific new statutory text for G.S. 135‑154 through G.S. 135‑200 and highlight substantive (non‑technical) changes; or
- Draft a short implementation checklist for system administrators and employers.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.