WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 4677

Restrictive procedures and seclusion requirements modifications and appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Julia Coleman and 1 co-sponsor

The bill tightens rules on restraining students and seclusion, mandates de-escalation, training, reporting, and funding to implement safer, trauma-informed practices.

Referred to Education Finance
#appropriations #childrenandfamiliesandchildren #youthandfamiliesdepartment #educationandeducationdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4677

Summary of SF 4677 (Session 2025-2026) — Minnesota

Overview

SF 4677, introduced in March 2026 and referred to the Education Finance Committee, addresses restrictive procedures and seclusion in schools and includes related appropriations. The bill has two Senate co-sponsors: Judy Seeberger and Julia Coleman. The action history shows an introduction and first reading on March 23, 2026, with referral to the Education Finance committee.

Purpose and Intent

  • The primary aim is to modify existing rules governing the use of restrictive procedures (often defined as physical holds or maneuvers) and the use of seclusion in school settings.
  • The bill also includes appropriations, indicating financial allocations to implement or support the changes, training, oversight, or related programmatic activities.

Key Provisions (provisional outline based on title and typical content in this policy area)

Note: The exact text of provisions is not provided in the summary you supplied. The following reflects common elements typically addressed in bills with similar titles and should be verified against the final language:
1. Restrictive Procedures:
- Set clearer standards for when and how physical restraints can be used on students.
- Prohibit or severely limit certain restraint methods deemed unsafe or inappropriate.
- Require de-escalation, prompt staff debriefing, and documentation after any use of restraint.
- Establish reporting requirements to districts, schools, and possibly state authorities.
- Implement mandatory training for school personnel on safe techniques, youth development, and trauma-informed practices.

  1. Seclusion:

    • Prohibit or narrowly regulate the use of seclusion (placing a student alone in a room or space unauthorized to mindfully contain them).
    • Define acceptable and prohibited circumstances for any time-out-like confinement.
    • Require monitoring, time limits, and post-event review and documentation.
    • Require alternatives to seclusion, such as de-escalation strategies and additional supports (e.g., behavior plans, mental health supports).

  2. Training and Oversight:

    • Mandate standardized training for school staff on trauma-informed care, implicit bias, and crisis intervention.
    • Establish oversight mechanisms, such as data collection and reporting to a state department or agency.
    • Potentially create a reporting portal or annual report detailing incidents, outcomes, and trends.

  3. Data and Reporting:

    • Collect and publish data on the use of restraints and seclusions, including frequency, duration, setting, and student demographics.
    • Provide schools with guidance on data submission timelines and formats.

  4. Appropriations:

    • Specify funding to support training, additional staff or consultants, data systems, monitoring, and enforcement.
    • Outline fiscal year allocations and any sunset or reporting requirements tied to funding.

Who Is Affected

  • Students: All students within Minnesota public schools are affected indirectly by any changes in how restrictive procedures and seclusion are used, with particular impact on students with disabilities, behavior challenges, or trauma histories.
  • School Personnel: Teachers, administrators, school resource officers, counselors, and other staff involved in crisis intervention and student safety.
  • School Districts and Charter Schools: Responsible for complying with updated standards, reporting requirements, and training mandates.
  • State Agencies: If the bill assigns oversight or data collection, relevant state departments (likely the Department of Education and/or Department of Health or Human Services) would administer provisions and monitor compliance.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduced: March 23, 2026.
  • Committee: Referred to Education Finance (March 23, 2026).
  • Next Steps: The committee would consider amendments, potential fiscal notes, and vote to advance to the full chamber. If passed, the bill would move to the other legislative chamber and then to conference committee if discrepancies arise, followed by veto considerations or enactment.

Potential Impact and Considerations

  • Enhanced safety and well-being for students by restricting harmful restraint and seclusion practices.
  • Greater transparency through data collection and public reporting.
  • Increased training and resource needs for districts to comply with updated standards.
  • Fiscal implications depending on the scope of training, personnel, and data infrastructure funded by the appropriations.

If you have access to the bill's full text, I can provide a line-by-line breakdown of the exact provisions and cite specific sections, numbers, and deadlines.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.