WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 2789

Restricted pesticide handler definition addition provision and restricted pesticide license requirements for handlers modifications

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Rob Kupec and 1 co-sponsor

Defines a restricted pesticide handler and tightens license requirements for such handlers, boosting oversight and safety in handling restricted-use pesticides.

Referred to Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development
#agricultureandagriculturedepartment #fertilizersandpesticides
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 2789

Summary of SF 2789 – Restricted pesticide handler definition addition provision and restricted pesticide license requirements for handlers modifications

Quick snapshot

  • Bill: SF 2789
  • Title: Restricted pesticide handler definition addition provision and restricted pesticide license requirements for handlers modifications
  • Status: Referred to Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development
  • Introduced: March 20, 2025
  • Legislative session: 94th Legislature (2025–2026)
  • Companion bill: HF 2898

Overview and purpose

SF 2789 proposes changes to the state’s regulation of pesticide handling by adding a new definition for a "restricted pesticide handler" and modifying the license requirements applicable to restricted pesticide handlers. While the full statutory text is not provided here, the bill’s title indicates an aim to tighten or refine eligibility, training, certification, or other license criteria for individuals who handle restricted-use pesticides, thereby strengthening oversight and safety standards in pesticide operations.

Key provisions (as suggested by bill title)

  • New definition: Adds a definition for “restricted pesticide handler” within relevant pesticide regulatory statutes.
  • License requirements: Modifies the licensing framework for restricted pesticide handlers. Potential areas of change (subject to actual text) could include:
    • Eligibility criteria or qualifications
    • Required training or certification levels
    • Renewal intervals and ongoing compliance requirements
    • Fees or administrative procedures
    • Penalties or enforcement mechanisms for noncompliance
  • Note: The exact language, scope, and any transitional provisions will be in the bill text. This summary reflects the elements indicated by the title.

Affected parties

  • Individuals who handle restricted-use pesticides (restricted pesticide handlers)
  • Employers and organizations that employ or supervise restricted pesticide handlers
  • Training providers and certification bodies administering licenses
  • The state Agriculture Department and its fertilizers and pesticides regulatory program responsible for implementing and enforcing the provisions

Legislative process and timeline

  • Introduction and first reading: March 20, 2025
  • Referral: Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development committee
  • As a companion to HF 2898, there is parallel action in the House; coordination between chambers will influence timing, potential amendments, and passage.

Related legislation

  • HF 2898 is the companion bill in the House with substantially similar subject matter (restricted pesticide handler definitions and license requirements).

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Enhanced safety and compliance for handling restricted-use pesticides
  • Possible changes in licensing costs, training requirements, and administrative processes
  • Impact on agricultural operations, pesticide applicators, and training providers
  • Needs for department rulemaking and potential funding or staffing implications to enforce new definitions and license standards

Next steps for interested readers

  • Review the full bill text and fiscal notes once available to understand precise definitions, standards, and deadlines.
  • Monitor committee hearings and floor actions in both chambers for amendments and final disposition.
  • Compare SF 2789 with HF 2898 to anticipate enacted language and any reconciliation steps.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.