WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SJR 1

Rescinding previous applications for a federal constitutional convention.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Ben Allen and 5 co-sponsors

California formally withdraws all previous applications for a federal constitutional convention, removing itself from efforts to convene delegates for proposing U.S. constitutional amendments.

Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 174, Statutes of 2025.
#rescindingpreviousapplicationsforafederalconstitutionalconvention
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SJR 1

Legislative bill overview

California SJR 1 formally rescinds all previous applications the state had submitted requesting a federal constitutional convention. A constitutional convention would allow delegates to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution without going through the standard congressional amendment process. This resolution withdraws California from any collective effort that had been made toward triggering such a convention.

Why is this important

Article V of the U.S. Constitution allows states to call for a convention if two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states) submit applications. Once triggered, a convention could theoretically propose unlimited amendments, making it a high-stakes mechanism that hasn't been used since the original 1787 convention. By rescinding its applications, California removes itself from efforts that proponents believed could address issues like campaign finance or congressional term limits, but which opponents feared could destabilize constitutional protections.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of previous applications unclear: The bill doesn't specify which past applications it rescinded or their original purposes, making it difficult to assess what specific amendment efforts California abandoned
  • Ideological divide on constitutional reform: Supporters of a convention view it as necessary democratic reform; opponents see it as an existential risk to constitutional rights and protections
  • Irreversibility and changing circumstances: By rescinding applications, California locks in a position that future legislatures cannot easily reverse, regardless of changed political conditions or new consensus on constitutional issues

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.