Bill
SB 836
Requires political committees to disclose and keep up-to-date the chair’s contact information for public access.
SB 836 (Session 2026) – West Virginia
Summary of the bill: Requiring contact information for chair of political committee
Note: The bill text provided appears to be corrupted data. The summary below is based on the bill title, action history, and sponsor information. If the final, official text becomes available, please substitute with the authoritative provisions.
1) Purpose and intent
- Goal: To require transparency regarding the leadership of political committees by mandating contact details for the chair.
- Context suggested by title: Improve public accessibility to leadership for political committees, facilitating communication with the committee’s chair for inquiries, complaints, or compliance purposes.
2) Key provisions and changes (as implied by the title)
- Disclosure requirement: Political committees (likely including state-level campaign committees, party committees, or similar entities under state law) must provide current contact information for the chair.
- Scope of required information: Typically would include a physical mailing address, telephone number, and email or other electronic contact method. The exact fields would be defined in the bill text.
- Accountability and updates: Provisions may require committees to update the contact information within a specified timeframe after changes (e.g., within a certain number of days of assuming or changing the role).
- Public accessibility: The contact information would likely be accessible to the public, possibly through the secretary of state’s office, ethics commission, or a designated state agency, and may be posted on a public website or official records portal.
- Compliance mechanism: Potential penalties or enforcement processes for non-compliance, including notice and a remediation period, and possible sanctions for willful failure to provide or update information.
- Relationship to existing disclosures: The bill may reference or integrate with other disclosure requirements for political committees (e.g., campaign finance filings, registries of committees, or lobbyist disclosures).
3) Who or what would be affected
- Political committees: State-level campaign committees, party committees, and potentially political action committees operating under state law.
- Officers and leadership: Specifically the chair (and possibly co-chairs or acting chairs) of committees would be the focus of the reporting requirement.
- Government agencies: Likely the secretary of state, ethics or campaign finance authorities, and any state portal or registry managing disclosures.
- Public and media: Increased public access to contact channels for queries, accountability, and oversight.
4) Procedural and timeline aspects
- Introduction and referral: Filed for introduction on February 9, 2026; referred to Judiciary in the Senate.
- Sponsorship: Primary sponsor not listed; co-sponsor: Robbie Morris.
- Legislative process: As with typical bills, the next steps would involve committee hearings, potential amendments, floor votes in the Senate, and eventual consideration by the House (if applicable) and final enactment or veto.
- Effective date: The summary cannot determine a specific effective date or phase-in period without the full text. Bills of this nature commonly include an effective date (e.g., upon enactment or a set date) and may include transitional provisions for ongoing committees.
Notes and next steps
- The verbatim bill text is not readable here due to corruption. To provide a precise, complete summary, please supply the official, clean text of SB 836, including sections outlining definitions, required fields, update timelines, enforcement, and effective date.
- If available, include any fiscal impact statements, regulatory impact, and any related ethics or campaign finance provisions that interact with this requirement.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
