WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1134

Requires the prior approval of the appropriate legislative committees required of agency rules and regulations

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Tedisco

Gives courts discretion to impose only part of a revoked suspended sentence for house-of-correction terms, reducing full-term imposition and allowing probation changes.

REFERRED TO COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SMALL BUSINESS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1134

Summary — S.1134: "An Act relative to probation violations" (Massachusetts)

Note on source material: The packet you provided includes two different bills that share the designation “S 1134” from different jurisdictions. This summary focuses on the Massachusetts bill titled “An Act relative to probation violations” (Senate Docket No. 1100 / presented by Senator Patricia D. Jehlen). The packet also contains an unrelated Idaho bill (also numbered S 1134) concerning liquor licenses for “established caterers”; that bill is not the focus here but is noted at the end of this summary to avoid confusion.

Purpose and intent

The bill changes how courts handle revoked suspended sentences for defendants on probation. It narrows/clarifies the consequences when a suspended sentence is revoked, giving courts discretion—particularly for sentences to a house of correction—to impose only part of a suspended term rather than automatically imposing the full term.

Key provisions (textual changes)

  • Amends Section 133 of Chapter 127 of the General Laws by striking the last sentence (text of the removed sentence not provided in packet).
  • Amends Section 3 of Chapter 279 of the General Laws by replacing a sentence with four new sentences that provide:
    • If a suspended sentence to the state prison is revoked, the original sentence “shall be in full force and effect” (no change in effect for state-prison sentences).
    • If a suspended sentence to a house of correction is revoked, the court has discretion to:
    • Impose the full term of the suspended sentence; or
    • Impose a portion of the suspended sentence and leave the remaining balance suspended.
    • If the court imposes only a portion of the suspended sentence, the remaining balance (and the length for which it remains suspended) must be reduced by any time actually served on revocation.
    • If the court imposes less than the full term, the court may also revise the conditions of probation.

Who would be affected

  • Defendants in Massachusetts with suspended sentences to a house of correction who have their probation revoked.
  • Judges in the trial courts (additional sentencing discretion).
  • Probation officers and the corrections system (potential changes to revocation processing, jail bed use).
  • Victims and community stakeholders (modification of actual time served upon revocation may affect perceived accountability).

Potential impacts

  • Judicial discretion: Enables more tailored responses to probation violations for house-of-correction sentences (rather than automatic full-term incarceration).
  • Correctional population: Potential to reduce the number of people serving full suspended terms in jails (house of correction), possibly lowering local correctional costs and bed use; actual effects depend on judicial practice.
  • Probation supervision: Courts may revise probation conditions on partial imposition, affecting supervision terms and rehabilitation plans.
  • Legal consistency: Leaves the treatment of state-prison revocations unchanged (full sentence remains the default).

Procedural status and timeline (as provided)

  • Filed / docketed: Senate Docket No. 1100; filed 01/15/2025 (presented by Patricia D. Jehlen).
  • Referred to: The Judiciary (per docket).
  • Hearing scheduled: June 3, 2025 (various entries show hearings scheduled for 06/03/2025; confirm exact time/location with the chamber calendar — packet lists A‑2).
  • Legislative notes: Packet indicates similar matter was filed in the prior session (see Senate No. 1007 of 2023–2024).

Miscellaneous / source discrepancies

  • The packet also includes an unrelated Idaho bill (also labeled S 1134) that creates an “established caterer” liquor license (Section 23‑903d, Idaho Code) with registration fee $150 and per‑event license fee $50; effective July 1, 2025. That Idaho measure is separate and not part of the Massachusetts probation bill.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a line-by-line comparison of current law vs. the bill’s new text;
- Draft a short briefing for judges, probation officers, or legislators on likely operational impacts; or
- Summarize the unrelated Idaho bill in similar detail.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.