WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 144

Requires the MTA to file a copy of proposed station closings with various governmental agencies

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Simcha Eichenstein

MTA must file copies of any proposed station closing with designated government agencies, boosting transparency and interagency oversight, with added admin work for the MTA.

REFERRED TO CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES AND COMMISSIONS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 144

Summary of Bill A 144

Overview

  • Bill number: A 144
  • Title / purpose: Requires the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to file a copy of proposed station closings with various governmental agencies. The goal appears to be enhancing intergovernmental oversight and transparency around decisions to close MTA stations.
  • Status: Referred to the Assembly committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions.
  • Introduced: January 8, 2025
  • Primary sponsor: Simcha Eichenstein
  • Related bills (prior-session): A 9362, A 203

Legislative Actions

  • 2025-01-08: Referred to Corporations, Authorities and Commissions (listed twice in the provided record)

What the bill would do (Key Provisions)

  • The MTA would be required to file a copy of any proposed station closing with specified governmental agencies.
  • The bill designates “various governmental agencies” as recipients, but the exact list of agencies is not specified in the available information.
  • The provision focuses on disclosure and interagency coordination related to proposed station closings.

Note: The full text would confirm which agencies are included, the format of filings, timing (when the copies must be filed), and any follow-up duties (e.g., responses, public notice, or additional steps).

Who would be affected

  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA): Primary entity obligated to prepare and transmit copies.
  • Governmental agencies receiving filings: Entities responsible for oversight, planning, budgeting, or regulatory functions that would review the proposed station closings.
  • General public / stakeholders: The bill’s intent suggests increased transparency around MTA station-closing decisions, which could affect public consultation and awareness.

Procedural and timeline notes

  • The bill has been introduced and referred to the Assembly committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions.
  • No further actions (e.g., hearings, amendments, or votes) are listed in the provided record.
  • As with typical bills, if advanced, timing and required filings would be defined in the bill’s text (including deadlines and the list of agencies).

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Transparency and oversight: By requiring copies of proposed closures to be filed with multiple agencies, the bill could improve interagency coordination and public accountability for MTA station-closing decisions.
  • Administrative burden: The MTA would incur additional administrative tasks to prepare and distribute filings.
  • Policy implications: The bill signals a preference for formalized oversight of service-affecting changes and could influence how quickly or slowly stations are closed depending on interagency responses or requirements.

Related context

  • The bill’s sponsor is Simcha Eichenstein.
  • Related bills from prior sessions (A 9362 and A 203) may address similar or related oversight/closure processes and could provide context on legislative intent or approach.

Next steps for readers

  • Monitor committee actions for A 144 to see if it advances, and if amendments specify the list of agencies, filing timelines, and any public-comment or regulatory review requirements.
  • Review the full bill text for precise definitions, scope, penalties (if any), and enforcement mechanisms.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.