WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 566

Requires the estimated cost of mandated expenditures and appropriations within the body of the bill

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Karl Brabenec and 11 co-sponsors

Requires any bill with mandated expenditures or appropriations to include an estimated cost inside the bill, boosting fiscal transparency for lawmakers and the public.

REFERRED TO GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 566

Summary of Assembly Bill A 566

Overview

  • Bill Number: A 566
  • Official Title (as provided): Requires the estimated cost of mandated expenditures and appropriations within the body of the bill
  • Status: Referred to Governmental Operations
  • Introduced: January 8, 2025
  • Primary Sponsor: Mary Beth Walsh (with multiple cosponsors)

Purpose and intent

A 566 would mandate that any bill containing mandated expenditures or appropriations include an estimated cost within the bill itself. The overarching goal is to improve fiscal transparency by ensuring that lawmakers and the public can readily see the expected financial impact of proposed mandates and funding actions before a bill advances.

Key provisions (anticipated based on title)

  • Cost inclusion requirement: The bill would require the inclusion of an estimated cost for any mandated expenditures and for any appropriations described in the bill’s text.
  • Scope of cost estimates: The estimate would pertain to the financial impact of new or ongoing mandates and appropriations contained in the bill, facilitating budgeting and fiscal review.
  • Placement of the estimate: The cost information would appear within the bill’s body, making the fiscal impact a visible and integral part of the legislation.

Note: The exact statutory definitions, methodologies, and formatting requirements for the cost estimates would be detailed in the bill’s text. The summary below reflects the core concept based on the title.

Affected parties and stakeholders

  • Legislators and staff: Those responsible for drafting, analyzing, and voting on bills would use the embedded cost estimates for decision-making.
  • State and local governments: Agencies and entities responsible for implementing mandates or managing appropriations would be affected by clearer fiscal parameters.
  • Taxpayers and the public: Enhanced transparency aims to provide clearer information about the cost of proposed legislation.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • Current status: Referred to Governmental Operations, indicating the bill is at an early stage and awaiting committee consideration.
  • Actions to watch: If advanced, the bill would move through committee hearings, possible amendments, and potential floor votes in the Assembly. A companion or related measures exist (see “Related legislation” below), which may influence discussion or priority.
  • Related/companion measures:
    • Companion bill in the Senate: S 1956 (listed as companion)
    • Prior-session related Assembly bills: A 3872, A 6181, A 1489, A 8449, A 6792, A 5876, A 995, A 3337, A 2374
    • These related bills suggest ongoing interest in fiscal transparency and cost disclosure mechanisms.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Fiscal transparency: The measure has the potential to improve understanding of the financial implications of legislation, aiding budgeting and oversight.
  • Legislative workload: Requiring internal cost estimates could increase administrative requirements for bill drafters and fiscal staff.
  • Implementation specifics: Effectiveness will depend on how costs are defined (e.g., time horizon, inclusion of indirect costs, funding sources) and how the estimates are calculated and presented within the bill text.

This summary presents the essential information needed to understand A 566’s purpose, provisions, and potential effects based on the bill’s current title and introductory status.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.