WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 5195

Requires producer of certain firefighting equipment containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances to provide written notice to purchaser; prohibits sale, manufacture, and distribution of certain firefighting equipment containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.*

2024-2025 Regular Session Introduced by Clinton Calabrese and 9 co-sponsors

New Jersey prohibits sale and manufacture of firefighting equipment with intentionally added PFAS while requiring disclosure notices on equipment containing these "forever chemicals."

Received in the Senate without Reference, 2nd Reading
#firefighters #hazsubstanc
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 5195

Legislative bill overview

Bill A 5195 requires manufacturers and sellers of firefighting equipment containing PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances) to notify purchasers in writing about their presence, and prohibits the sale, manufacture, and distribution of firefighting equipment with intentionally added PFAS. The bill addresses "forever chemicals" commonly found in aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) used at airports, military bases, and fire training facilities.

Why is this important

PFAS compounds persist indefinitely in the environment and bioaccumulate in human blood, with studies linking them to health issues including kidney disease, thyroid problems, and immune suppression. Firefighting foams are a major source of PFAS contamination in groundwater and drinking water supplies, particularly near airports and military installations. This bill aims to reduce environmental exposure and protect public health by restricting these chemicals in firefighting equipment.

Potential points of contention

  • Feasibility and cost: Manufacturers may argue that alternative firefighting formulations are still under development, and compliance costs could be passed to fire departments already operating on limited budgets
  • Emergency response gaps: Fire departments and airport operators may claim the prohibition could compromise firefighting effectiveness if suitable PFAS-free alternatives aren't readily available or equally effective for certain fire types
  • Interstate commerce issues: New Jersey's restrictions could conflict with federal aviation standards or create supply chain complications if manufacturers cannot produce PFAS-free versions meeting existing performance certifications

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.