WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 3987

Requires hospitals which offer medical residency training to provide certain obstetric-gynecology training

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Kevin Parker

Hospitals running medical residency programs must provide obstetric-gynecology training to residents, standardizing education and improving patient care.

REFERRED TO HEALTH
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 3987

Summary of Bill: S 3987

Overview

S 3987 is a New York State bill introduced on January 31, 2025, titled
“Requires hospitals which offer medical residency training to provide certain obstetric-gynecology training.” The bill has been assigned to the Health Committee (referred to Health) and has no further actions listed beyond referral as of the current record.

  • Bill Number: S 3987
  • Title: Requires hospitals which offer medical residency training to provide certain obstetric-gynecology training
  • Status: Referred to Health
  • Introduced: January 31, 2025
  • Sponsor (primary): Kevin S. Parker
  • Companion/Related/Previous Sessions: Includes companion bills (e.g., A 1011) and several related/same-subject bills from prior sessions (e.g., A 3693, A 3903, S 7366, S 4813, S 5207, etc.)

Purpose and Intent

The bill seeks to ensure that hospitals that operate medical residency training programs must provide obstetric-gynecology (OB-GYN) training to residents. While the exact requirements are defined in the bill’s text, the purpose appears to be to standardize or strengthen OB-GYN training within residency programs to improve resident education and, ultimately, patient care in obstetrics and gynecology.

Key Provisions (as described)

The summary relies on the title and status, as the full text is not provided here. Based on the bill’s stated scope:

  • Mandatory OB-GYN Training Component: Hospitals that run medical residency programs would be required to offer obstetric-gynecology training to residents.
  • Scope of Training: The bill would specify the nature and scope of OB-GYN training (e.g., clinical rotations, didactic education, simulations, patient-care experiences) in its text or in implementing regulations.
  • Compliance and Oversight: The bill would establish mechanisms for ensuring compliance (e.g., reporting, accreditation considerations, or oversight by the Health Committee or relevant agencies).
  • Effective Date/Phase-In: Any timeline for implementation would be defined in the bill or accompanying regulations (not provided in the available summary).

Note: Specific curricular requirements, exemptions, funding, and enforcement details would be found in the enacted text and implementing rules.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Hospitals with Medical Residency Programs: Primary entities responsible for providing the OB-GYN training under the bill.
  • Residency Programs/Residents: Medical residents in obstetrics-gynecology at affected hospitals, who would receive the mandated training.
  • Hospitals’ Education Departments and Accreditation Bodies: Responsible for ensuring compliance and aligning curricula with the bill’s requirements.
  • Patients: Potential indirect beneficiaries through improved OB-GYN training and patient safety/quality of care.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Current Stage: Referred to Health (January 31, 2025). No further actions listed.
  • Next Steps: The Health Committee would consider the bill, potentially hold hearings, amend, and move it to floor votes. If approved, it would proceed to the other house(s) and eventually to the governor for action.
  • Related Activity: The bill has numerous related/companion bills from prior sessions, indicating ongoing legislative interest in OB-GYN residency training requirements.

Relationship to Related Legislation

  • Related Bills (prior sessions): A 3693, A 3903, A 2944, A 2715, A 2266, S 7366, S 4813, S 5207, S 6368.
  • Companion Bills: A 1011 is listed as a companion bill.
  • The pattern of related and companion bills suggests continued legislative interest in formalizing OB-GYN residency training standards across institutions with residency programs.

Potential Implications and Considerations

  • Quality of Training: If enacted, could raise the consistency and quality of OB-GYN training across hospitals.
  • Costs and Compliance: Hospitals may incur costs to develop or adjust curricula, hire/retain faculty, or enhance simulations and clinical experiences.
  • Workforce and Patient Care: Potential positive impact on OB-GYN care delivery and patient outcomes through improved resident preparedness.
  • Implementation Details: The precise requirements, exemptions, and enforcement mechanisms will determine the bill’s practicality and impact. Stakeholders may seek clarification on definitions of “certain OB-GYN training,” phased implementation, and funding.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to emphasize potential fiscal impacts, compliance considerations, or draft a set of stakeholder questions for hearings.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.